Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

Collecting Multidimensional Numerical Data and Estimating Mean with Personalized Local Differential Privacy

Local Differential Privacy for data collection and analysis

AAA: an Adaptive Mechanism for Locally Differential Private Mean Estimation

On the Risks of Collecting Multidimensional Data Under Local Differential Privacy

APLDP: Adaptive personalized local differential privacy data collection in mobile crowdsensing

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Mean Estimation of Numerical Data Under (ε,δ) -Utility-Optimized Local Differential Privacy

CALM: Consistent Adaptive Local Marginal for Marginal Release under Local Differential Privacy.

Collecting and Analyzing Data from Smart Device Users with Local Differential Privacy

Collecting Multi-type and Correlation-Constrained Streaming Sensor Data with Local Differential Privacy

Task-aware Privacy Preservation for Multi-dimensional Data

Local Differential Private Data Aggregation for Discrete Distribution Estimation

Private Mean Estimation with Person-Level Differential Privacy

A Utility-Optimized Framework for Personalized Private Histogram Estimation

Numerical Estimation of Spatial Distributions under Differential Privacy

A Comprehensive Survey on Local Differential Privacy toward Data Statistics and Analysis

AdaPDP: Adaptive Personalized Differential Privacy.

LDPTube: Theoretical Utility Benchmark and Enhancement for LDP Mechanisms in High-dimensional Space

Instance-optimal Mean Estimation Under Differential Privacy

Local Differential Privacy and Its Applications: A Comprehensive Survey

Mean Estimation of Numerical Data under (ϵ, Δ)-Utility-optimized Local Differential Privacy