Abstract:The benefits of implementing negative emission technologies in the global warming response to cumulative carbon emissions until the year 2420 are assessed following the shared socioeconomic pathway (SSP) 1-2.6, the sustainable development scenario, with a comprehensive set of intermediate-complexity Earth system model integrations. Model integrations include 86 different model realisations covering a wide range of plausible climate states. The global warming response is assessed in terms of two key climate metrics: the effective transient climate response to cumulative CO 2 emissions (eTCRE), measuring the surface warming response to cumulative carbon emissions and associated non-CO 2 forcing, and the effective zero emissions commitment (eZEC), measuring the extent of any continued warming after net-zero CO 2 emissions are reached. The transient climate response to cumulative CO 2 emissions (TCRE) is estimated as 2.2 K EgC −1 (median value) with a 10 %–90 % range of 1.75 to 3.13 K EgC −1 in 2100, approximated from the eTCRE by removing the contribution of non-CO 2 forcing. During the positive emission phase, the eTCRE decreases from 2.71 (2.0 to 3.65) to 2.61 (1.91 to 3.62) K EgC −1 due to a weakening in the dependence of radiative forcing on atmospheric carbon, which is partly opposed by an increasing fraction of the radiative forcing warming the surface as the ocean stratifies. During the net negative and zero emission phases, a progressive reduction in the eTCRE to 2.0 (1.39 to 2.96) K EgC −1 is driven by the reducing airborne fraction as atmospheric CO 2 is drawn down mainly by the ocean. The model uncertainty in the slopes of warming versus cumulative CO 2 emissions varies from being controlled by the radiative feedback parameter during positive emissions to being affected by carbon-cycle parameters during net negative emissions, consistent with the drivers of uncertainty diagnosed from the coefficient of variation of the contributions in the eTCRE framework. The continued warming after CO 2 emissions cease and remain at zero gives a model mean eZEC of − 0.03 K after 25 years, which decreases in time to − 0.21 K at 90 years after emissions cease. However, there is a spread in the ensemble with a temperature overshoot occurring in 20 % of the ensemble members at 25 years after cessation of emissions. If net negative emissions are included, there is a reduction in atmospheric CO 2 and there is a decrease in temperature overshoot so that the eZEC is positive in only 5 % of the ensemble members. Hence, incorporating negative emissions enhances the ability to meet climate targets and avoid risk of continued warming after net zero is reached.

The role of negative CO2 emissions for reaching 2 °C—insights from integrated assessment modelling

Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions

Negative Emissions Physically Needed to Keep Global Warming below 2 °C

Impact of negative and positive CO2 emissions on global warming metrics using an ensemble of Earth system model simulations

Model-based scenarios for achieving net negative emissions in the food system

Research priorities for negative emissions

The climate change mitigation potential of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage

The feasibility of low CO2 concentration targets and the role of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)

Exploring IMAGE model scenarios that keep greenhouse gas radiative forcing below 3 W/m2 in 2100

Alternative pathways to the 1.5 C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies

Cost and attainability of meeting stringent climate targets without overshoot

RCP2. 6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2 C

Role of negative emission technologies in South Africa's pathway to net zero emissions by 2050

The role of negative emissions in meeting China's 2060 carbon neutrality goal

Carbon dioxide removal potential from decentralised bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and the relevance of operational choices

Simulating the Earth system response to negative emissions

Immediate deployment opportunities for negative emissions with BECCS: a Swedish case study

Decarbonising the critical sectors of aviation, shipping, road freight and industry to limit warming to 1.5–2 C

Human and planetary health implications of negative emissions technologies