Abstract:Bioenergy with carbon capture and geological storage (BECCS) is a top option to both decrease CO2 emissions and remove CO2 currently in the atmosphere. BECCS requires that we can sustainably produce biomass without impacting the capacity for food and feed production. We modeled yield potential on U.S. marginal land for three promising perennial biomass crops: Miscanthus, switchgrass, and energycane. Under current (2000–2014) and forecasted future (2036–2050) conditions we optimized the spatial distribution of these three crops for yield potential. The predicted biomasses from these crops on marginal land are estimated to offset about 11% of the current U.S. CO2 emissions. Bioenergy with carbon capture and geological storage (BECCS) is considered one of the top options for both offsetting CO2 emissions and removing atmospheric CO2. BECCS requires using limited land resources efficiently while ensuring minimal adverse impacts on the delicate food‐energy‐water nexus. Perennial C4 biomass crops are productive on marginal land under low‐input conditions avoiding conflict with food and feed crops. The eastern half of the contiguous U.S. contains a large amount of marginal land, which is not economically viable for food production and liable to wind and water erosion under annual cultivation. However, this land is suitable for geological CO2 storage and perennial crop growth. Given the climate variation across the region, three perennials are major contenders for planting. The yield potential and stability of Miscanthus, switchgrass, and energycane across the region were compared to select which would perform best under the recent (2000–2014) and future (2036–2050) climates. Miscanthus performed best in the Midwest, switchgrass in the Northeast and energycane in the Southeast. On average, Miscanthus yield decreased from present 19.1 t/ha to future 16.8 t/ha; switchgrass yield from 3.5 to 2.4 t/ha; and energycane yield increased from 14 to 15 t/ha. Future yield stability decreased in the region with higher predicted drought stress. Combined, these crops could produce 0.6–0.62 billion tonnes biomass per year for the present and future. Using the biomass for power generation with CCS would capture 703–726 million tonnes of atmospheric CO2 per year, which would offset about 11% of current total U.S. emission. Further, this biomass approximates the net primary CO2 productivity of two times the current baseline productivity of existing vegetation, suggesting a huge potential for BECCS. Beyond BECCS, C4 perennial grasses could also increase soil carbon and provide biomass for emerging industries developing replacements for non‐renewable products including plastics and building materials.

Carbon dioxide removal potential from decentralised bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and the relevance of operational choices

Potential for carbon dioxide removal of carbon capture and storage on biomass‐fired combined heat and power production

A bottom-up regional potential assessment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in Germany

Which bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) pathways can provide net-negative emissions?

Sustainability implications of different carbon dioxide removal technologies in the context of Europe's climate neutrality goal

Evaluating the use of biomass energy with carbon capture and storage in low emission scenarios

Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS): Viability and Potential

A Review of Influencing Factors for Policy Interventions in the Deployment of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage

Global biomethane and carbon dioxide removal potential through anaerobic digestion of waste biomass

Can bioenergy with carbon capture and storage deliver negative emissions? A critical review of life cycle assessment

Temperature Changes Induced by Biogeochemical and Biophysical Effects of Bioenergy Crop Cultivation

Decarbonising Industry via BECCS: Promising Sectors, Challenges, and Techno-economic Limits of Negative Emissions

Immediate deployment opportunities for negative emissions with BECCS: a Swedish case study

Capacity of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage in China Consistent with the Global Remaining Carbon Budget

Bioenergy with carbon capture, storage and utilization: Potential technologies to mitigate climate change

Climate vs Energy Security: Quantifying the Trade-offs of BECCS Deployment and Overcoming Opportunity Costs on Set-Aside Land

Integrating Carbon Dioxide Removal Into European Emissions Trading

Waste-to-energy and waste-to-hydrogen with CCS: Methodological assessment of pathways to carbon-negative waste treatment from an LCA perspective

Delaying carbon dioxide removal in the European Union puts climate targets at risk

The role of BECCS technology in achieving carbon neutrality: evidences from China' coal power sector

Biomass yield potential on U.S. marginal land and its contribution to reach net‐zero emission