Tensile Strength of Nerve Bridging Models Using Collagen Nerve Conduits

Yusuke Hattori,Shinsuke Takeda,Takuya Usami,Ryutaro Shibata,Hiroshi Takahashi,Yuji Joyo,Yohei Kawaguchi,Hideki Okamoto,Hideki Murakami,Permsak Paholpak,Hideyuki Ota
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2387-3282
2024-09-14
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Abstract:Background In the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries with nerve defects, second-generation collagen-based conduits, such as Renerve® (Nipro, Osaka, Japan), have shown the potential for promoting nerve regeneration. However, there is concern related to the weak material properties. No previous studies have addressed the strength of the bridging model using collagen conduits. This study aimed to investigate the tensile strength and failure patterns in nerve defect models bridged with Renerve® conduits through biomechanical research. Methods Using fresh chicken sciatic nerves, we examined the maximum failure load of four groups: bridging models using Renerve® with one suture (group A), with two sutures (group B), with three sutures (group C), and end-to-end neurorrhaphy models with two sutures (group N). Each group had eight specimens. We also evaluated failure patterns of the specimens. Results Group N showed a significantly higher maximum failure load (0.96 ± 0.13 N) compared to groups A (0.23 ± 0.06 N, p < 0.0001), B (0.29 ± 0.05 N, p < 0.0001), and C (0.40 ± 0.10 N, p < 0.0001). Regarding failure patterns, all specimens in group A showed nerve-end dislocation from the conduit. Two specimens in group B and three specimens in group C failed due to circumferential cracks in the conduit. Six specimens in group B and five specimens in group C exhibited cutting out of sutures from the conduit. Conclusion This study suggests that the number of sutures in synthetic collagen nerve conduits has little effect on the maximum failure load. To take advantage of its biomaterial benefits, a period of postoperative range of motion restriction may be required. † These two authors contributed equally to this work. Received: 31 March 2024 Accepted: 26 July 2024 Accepted Manuscript online: 14 August 2024 Article published online: 12 September 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?