Effect of nerve fragments and nerve growth factor on biological conduit small gap bridging to repair peripheral nerve injury

Pei-xun Zhang,Jian Li,Na Han,Hong-bo Zhang,Fu-qiang Zhao,Bao-guo Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2008.23.023
2008-01-01
Abstract:Background: The effect of biological conduit small gap bridging peripheral nerve injury is better than that of nerve stumps relatively rotated traditional epineurial neurorrhaphy. But whether adding some factors into conduit can improve the nerve regeneration effect remains valuable to be explored. Objective: To investigate the effect of the comminuted nerve fragments and nerve growth factor in biological conduit small gap bridging peripheral nerve injury. Design, time and setting: Randomized control animal experiments were carried out in Peking University People's Hospital from August 2006 to November 2007 by nerve electrophysiological and histological assessments. Materials: Thirty healthy male adult SD rats, weighting 250-300 g, were adopted to induce sciatic nerve injury at the midpoint between sciatic nerve pelvic cavity outlet and the site tibia nerve and fibula nerve bifurcated. Hollow cylindrical conduit was invented by Peking University People's Hospital and Chinese Spinning and Weaving Institute, a kind of de-acetyl chitin biological conduit. Injectable nerve growth factor was provided by Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, the Academy of Military Medical Sciences. Methods: All the 20 SD rats involving 40 sciatic nerves were divided into 4 groups randomly, every group containing 10 nerves. Normal control group received no treatment; Pure conduit group was subjected to cutting sciatic nerve and performing biological conduit small gap bridging suture; Nerve growth factor group was added with after conduit small gap bridging; Comminuted nerve fragment group was added with autologous smashed nerve fragments after small gap bridging. Main outcome measures: Re-myelinated fibers were counted per view unit. Electrophysiological examination including sense and motor nerve conduction velocity were performed at 6 weeks after operation. Hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemical staining were performed to observe the morphologic changes of regenerated nerve fibers in pure conduits. Results: Compared with normal control group, re-myelinated fibers counting per view unit of other three groups were higher (P < 0.01), and the sense nerve conduction velocity and motor nerve conduction velocity were all lower (P < 0.01). Results of hematoxylin-eosin staining showed that, conduit contour remained with a great quantity of continuous regenerated tissues passing through conduit. Immunohistochemical staining displayed that the regenerated nerve fibers and axon sheath grew through conduit, and there was no significant difference in the number of regenerated fibers between distal end and proximal end. There were quite a lot of vascular tissues between regenerated fibers and conduit wall. Conclusion: Peripheral nerve regeneration cannot be improved by adding smashed nerve fragments and nerve growth factor in the biological conduit small gap bridging.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?