Abstract:Feminist, Southern, and decolonial thinkers have long argued that epistemological questions about how knowledge is produced and whose knowledge is valued and actioned are crucial in addressing inequalities, and a key challenge for planning. This collaborative article interrogates how knowledge is mobilised in urban planning and practice, discussing three experiences which have actively centred often-excluded voices, as a way of disrupting knowledge hierarchies in planning. We term these “emancipatory circuits of knowledge”—processes whereby diverse, situated, and marginalised forms of knowledge are co-produced and mobilised across urban research and planning, to address inequalities. We discuss experiences from the Technological University José Antonio Echeverría (CUJAE), a university in Havana, Cuba, that privileges a fluid and collaborative understanding of universities as social actors; the Sierra Leone Urban Research Centre, a research institute in the city of Freetown, which curates collective and inclusive spaces for community action planning, to challenge the legacies of colonial-era planning; and the Asian Coalition for Housing Rights, a regional network across Asia, which facilitates processes of exchange and co-learning which are highly strategic and situated in context, to advance community-led development. Shared across these “emancipatory circuits” are three “sites of impact” through which these partners have generated changes: encouraging inclusive policy and planning outcomes; shifting the planning praxis of authorities, bureaucrats, and researchers; and nurturing collective trajectories through building solidarities. Examining these three sites and their challenges, we query how urban knowledge is produced and translated towards epistemic justice, examining the tensions and the possibilities for building pathways to urban equality. Shared across these ‘emancipatory circuits’ are three layered ‘sites of impact’ through which these partners have generated changes: encouraging inclusive policy and planning outcomes; shifting the planning praxis of authorities, bureaucrats and researchers; and nurturing collective trajectories through processes of building solidarities. Examining these three sites and their challenges, we query the ways in which urban knowledge is produced and translated towards epistemic justice –examining the tensions and the possibilities for building pathways to urban equality.

Operationalizing spatial justice in urban planning: bridging theory with practice

Assumptions of the Concept of Spatial Justice in the Theory and Practice of Urban Planning Processes

A dynamic justice framework for analyzing conceptions of justice: the case of urban development projects

Weaving notions of justice into urban ecosystem services research and practice

Justice and power relations in urban greening: can Lisbon’s urban greening strategies lead to more environmental justice?

The concept of spatial justice and the European Union’s territorial cohesion

Spatial justice on the horizon? A combined Theory of Change scenario tool to assess place-based interventions

A Framework for the Spatial Inequality in Urban Public Facility for Urban Planning, Design and Management

Social Injustice Inflicted by Spatial Changes in Vernacular Settings: An Analysis of Published Literature

Comparing the application of different justice theories in equity analysis of transit projects: A case study of the Lisbon Metro Circular Line

Spatial intersectionality and transformative justice as frameworks for equitable urban planning in divided and post-conflict cities

Identifying public values and spatial conflicts in urban planning

Spatial Justice

Place-based development and spatial justice

Planning Ecologically Just Cities: A Framework to Assess Ecological Injustice Hotspots for Targeted Urban Design and Planning of Nature-Based Solutions

LEADER and Spatial Justice

Examining ecological justice within the social-ecological-technological system of New York City, USA

Conceptualising justice in transit-oriented development (TOD): towards an analytical framework

Spatial justice in relation to the urban amenities distribution in Austin, Texas

“Emancipatory Circuits of Knowledge” for Urban Equality: Experiences From Havana, Freetown, and Asia

Evaluating Justice in Accessibility to Urban Opportunities: Introducing Justice Analysis Frameworks Based on Theoretical Perspectives and Transportation Costs