Evaluating Justice in Accessibility to Urban Opportunities: Introducing Justice Analysis Frameworks Based on Theoretical Perspectives and Transportation Costs

Khashayar Moukouei,Hossein Haghshenas,Alireza Sahebgharani
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.106021
IF: 11.7
2024-12-03
Sustainable Cities and Society
Abstract:Accessibility analysis plays a crucial role in urban and transportation planning. However, the modeling and interpretation of accessibility can vary significantly across theoretical frameworks, which offer diverse considerations and measurement approaches. These distinctions profoundly influence planning evaluations and policy- and decision-making activities. Therefore, this article explores the impact of intellectual theories—specifically Bentham, Marx, Rawls, and Al-Sadr's perspectives—on justice assessments regarding accessibility to urban opportunities via public and private transportation. To achieve this, a gravity-based accessibility model that incorporates both internal and external costs is developed. Subsequently, quantifiable frameworks for justice assessment are introduced. Next, five scenarios are evaluated, and accessibility values are calculated for a selected study area. Finally, the results are ranked and analyzed within the context of the theoretical frameworks. The findings reveal that theoretical justice evaluation frameworks significantly influence the prioritization of scenarios. Additionally, incorporating internal and external transportation costs into the accessibility computation process not only affects accessibility values but also enhances the reflection of theoretical perspectives on justice. The results further demonstrate that the proposed accessibility model and justice evaluation frameworks can enable planners to embed justice-oriented approaches more comprehensively in the planning processes.
energy & fuels,construction & building technology,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?