Abstract:In the very early engineering design, engineers simplified the deformation behavior, constitutive model and failure mechanism of rock and soil, which were limited to the scope of linear elasticity.Later, with the development of geotechnical engineering, the scale of engineering became larger and larger, and the problems involved became more and more complicated, and engineering accidents caused by computing defects became more and more serious.Thus, scholars have realized that it is not enough to treat rock and soil simply as a linear elastic material.Nonlinear and numerical simulation is indispensable in geotechnical engineering.Finite element method is the most widely used numerical simulation method in geotechnical engineering.In recent years, scholars have applied finite element analysis software in slope stability analysis [1-3], tunnel excavation [4], foundation pit excavation [5] and other fields.For example, based on the generalized Biot's dynamic consolidation theory, Zou et al. [6] analyzed saturated soils by using the polygon scale boundary finite element method, and the results are in good agreement with the computations of finite element method.The finite difference method is an old numerical simulation method.In the 1980s, the ITASCA company of the United States developed the FLAC program based on the finite difference method.Subsequently, this method is widely used in numerical simulation of geotechnical engineering [7,8].Liu et al. [9] used a finite difference time domain method to establish a three-dimensional hole-bedrock-cave model for sonar detection of karst cavities.Kim and Larson [10] used FLAC3D to model the initiation and initial evolution of a strike-slip fault, and FLAC3D successfully replicated and created 3D fault zone of strike-slip faults within the entire thickness range of the model.There is also a paper in this Special Issue that utilizes the finite difference method in geotechnical engineering, "Numerical Analysis of Hard Rock Tunnel Excavated by Double Shield TBM based on CWFS model, Diyuan Li, Jing Sun, Quanqi Zhu, Xiangyun Xu, Jian Jiao".In their article, Flac3D was utilized to evaluate the practicability of DS-TBM (double shield tunnel boring machine) in a deep-buried high geostress tunnel.Compared with the finite element method, the advantage of the boundary element method is that it can simplify the calculation by dimension reduction.Mostly, the boundary element method is mainly utilized in an excavation of underground engineering [11], analysis of soil structure interaction [12, 13] and seepage analysis [14].Based on the boundary element method, Auersch [15] proposed a method combining the finite element boundary element method to calculate the dynamic interaction between soil mass and flexible structures such as single pile or complete wind tower.Xiao [16] proposed a boundary element method based on system partition and coupling strategy.There are two kinds of geotechnical materials targeted by the discrete element method: one is

Finite Element Geotechnical Analysis Incorporating Deep Learning-Based Soil Model

A Multifidelity Neural Network (MFNN) for Constitutive Modeling of Complex Soil Behaviors

Parallel Hierarchical Multiscale Modelling of Hydro-Mechanical Problems for Saturated Granular Soils

A Coupled SPFEM/DEM Approach for Multiscale Modeling of Large‐deformation Geomechanical Problems

Hierarchical Multiscale Modeling of Fluid-Saturated Soils

Seismic Evaluation of Soil–foundation–superstructure System Considering Geometry and Material Nonlinearities of Both Soils and Structures

Deep learning‐accelerated multiscale approach for granular material modeling

Reliability-based design in spatially variable soils using deep learning: an illustration using shallow foundation

An investigation of integrating the finite element method (FEM) with grey system theory for geotechnical problems.

Bridging finite element and deep learning: High-resolution stress distribution prediction in structural components

A Deep Learning Approach Replacing the Finite Difference Method for In Situ Stress Prediction

Introduction to the Special Issue: Nonlinearity and Numerical Simulation Applications in Geotechnical Engineering

Deep Learning Based Upscaling of Geomechanical Constitutive Behavior for Lithological Heterogeneities

Deep Active Learning for Constitutive Modelling of Granular Materials: from Representative Volume Elements to Implicit Finite Element Modelling

Modelling the mechanical behaviour of soils using machine learning algorithms with explicit formulations

Nonlinear static and dynamic analysis for geotechnical engineering based on quadtree mesh and polygon scaled boundary finite element method

DeepFEM: A Novel Element-Based Deep Learning Approach for Solving Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations in Computational Solid Mechanics

Prediction of Complex Strain Fields in Concrete Using a Deep Learning Approach

Large Deformation Modeling of Soil-Machine Interaction in Clay

CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS OF GRANULAR MATERIALS BY INTEGRATING MICROMECHANICAL KNOWLEDGE WITH DEEP LEARNING

Backcalculation of In-situ Nonlinear Viscoelastic Properties of Subgrade Using a Finite Element-Based Machine Learning Approach