Comparing the Efficacy of Povidone-Iodine and Normal Saline in Incisional Wound Irrigation to Prevent Superficial Surgical Site Infection: a Randomized Clinical Trial in Gastric Surgery.

L-Y. Zhao,W-H. Zhang,K. Liu,X-L. Chen,K. Yang,X-Z. Chen,J-K Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2022.10.005
2023-01-01
Abstract:Background: Prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) after gastrectomy has received increasing attention. Prophylactic incisional wound irrigation has been advocated to reduce SSI, but the choice of solution remains under debate.Aims: To compare the efficacies of wound irrigation with normal saline (NS) and povidone-iodine (PVI) for the prevention of SSI after gastrectomy, and to identify the risk factors for SSI.Methods: This randomized, single-centre clinical trial included 340 patients with gastric cancer. They were assigned at random into two groups (ratio 1:1) to receive either 0.9% NS or 1.0% PVI solution for incisional irrigation before wound closure. The primary endpoint was postoperative SSI within 30 days of gastrectomy, and the secondary endpoint was the length of hospital stay.Findings: In total, 333 patients were included in the modified intent-to-treat group, and the SSI rate did not differ significantly between the PVI group (11/167, 6.59%) and the NS group (9/166, 5.42%) [odds ratio (OR) 1.131, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.459-3.712; P=0.655]. Moreover, the difference between the two groups in terms of length of hospital stay was not significant (P=0.301). Body mass index (BMI) (OR 2.639, 95% CI 1.040-6.694; P=0.041) and postoperative complications (OR 2.565, 95% CI 1.023-6.431; P=0.045) were identified as independent risk factors for SSI.Conclusions: NS and PVI had similar efficacy as prophylactic wound irrigation for the prevention of SSI after gastrectomy. The risk of SSI was higher in patients with high BMI or postoperative complications. & COPY; 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Healthcare Infection Society.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?