Intraoperative wound irrigation to prevent surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Kaique Flavio Xavier Cardoso Filardi,Gustavo Roberto Minetto Wegner,Arnaldo Bastos dos Santos,Rafaela Goes Machado Filardi,Luana Ferreira Vasques,Marília Cardoso Massoni,Milena Poliana Chimanski Da Costa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12339
IF: 3.282
2024-09-13
World Journal of Surgery
Abstract:Introduction The potential benefit of intraoperative wound irrigation (IOWI) in preventing surgical site infection (SSI) remains unclear. The use of antimicrobial agents (AMA) or antiseptic agents (ASA) is controversial worldwide. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing AMA or ASA with saline solution in patients who underwent abdominal surgery. Sub‐analyses were performed on the type of surgery, type of intervention agent, and wound classification. Results Nineteen studies comprising 4915 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were included. SSI was observed in 207 out of 2504 patients in the intervention group (8.26 %) and 344 out of 2411 patients in the control group (14.27%). Overall, intraoperative wound irrigation (IOWI) with AMA or ASA was associated with a lower SSI (Odds ratio (OR) 0.62; 95% CI 0.47, 0.82; p
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?