Cost-Effectiveness of Presbyopia Correction among Seven Strategies of Bilateral Cataract Surgery Based on a Prospective Single-Blind Two-Center Trial in China.

Qianqian Lan,Yiyun Liu,Fan Xu,Min Li,Yaxin Li,Tingting Yang,Tong Sun,Gang Yao,Baikai Ma,Liyuan Tao,Xin Xiao,Xing Lin Feng,Siming Zeng,Hong Qi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00562-3
2022-01-01
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Abstract:The aim of this study was to explore a method to rank the cost-effectiveness of presbyopia correction in diverse strategies of bilateral cataract surgery to provide references for healthcare policymakers in rationalizing resource utilization and surgeons in customizing patient management. The cost-effectiveness analysis based on a prospective single-blind two-center clinical trial included seven strategies in bilateral cataract surgery: monofocal, monovision, diffractive bifocal, blended, refractive bifocal, trifocal, and extended depth of focus (EDOF) strategies. The effectiveness according to the objective spectacle independence rate (hereafter “rate”, a novel indicator defined as the proportion of patients with binocular uncorrected distance, intermediate and near visual acuity all better than 0.1 logMAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution), costs, average cost-effectiveness ratios (ACERs, /1
What problem does this paper attempt to address?