Abstract:The purpose of this article is to investigate how and when leader–member exchange (LMX) differentiation influences employees’ voice behavior by examining trust as a psychological process and two types of leader power as opposite moderators. Based on a sample of 61 teams from an energy corporation in China, we tested a moderated mediation model using multilevel structural equation modeling. The results show that LMX differentiation is negatively related to employees’ trust in leaders and, in turn, reduces employees’ voice behavior. Moreover, leader reward power negatively moderates the influence of LMX differentiation on employees’ trust in leaders such that the relationship is stronger when leader reward power is low but not significant when leader reward power is high. Leader coercive power positively moderates the relationship such that it is stronger when leader coercive power is high but not significant when leader coercive power is low. Furthermore, these two types of power moderate the indirect relationship between LMX differentiation and employees’ voice via their trust in leaders. This study is the first to unpack the mechanism that links LMX differentiation and voice behavior and the conditions under which LMX differentiation can exert influence. This study delineates a resource-based process with conservation of resources theory through which employees appraise the social stressor (LMX differentiation), perceive the value of future resource investment (trust), strategically respond to resource signals (leader power), and finally make resource investment decisions (voice behavior).

Supervisor Feedback, Relational Energy, and Employee Voice: the Moderating Role of Leader–member Exchange Quality

Supervisor Favorable Feedback and Employee Voice: A Moderated Mediation Framework

Supervisor Developmental Feedback and Voice: Relationship or Affect, Which Matters?

How Does Emotional Labor Influence Voice Behavior? the Roles of Work Engagement and Perceived Organizational Support

Linking Colleague Support To Employees' Promotive Voice: A Moderated Mediation Model

Effects of Perceptions on LMX and Work Performance: Effects of Supervisors’ Perception of Subordinates’ Emotional Intelligence and Subordinates’ Perception of Trust in the Supervisor on LMX And, Consequently, Performance

LMX and employee voice

Full of Energy – the Relationship Between Supervisor Developmental Feedback and Task Performance: a Conservation of Resources Perspective

Supervisors' upward exchange relationships and subordinate outcomes: testing the multilevel mediation role of empowerment.

The Multilevel Influence of Supervisor Helping Behavior on Employee Voice Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model

Servant Leadership and Follower Voice: A Dual-Centric Energizing Process

Effects of Employee Voice on Individual Performance: Conservation of Resources Perspective and Moderating Role of Supervisor-Subordinate Guanxi

How Chinese Employees’ Voice Behavior Is Motivated: The Role of Perceived Overqualification

ETHICAL LEADERSHIP AND EMPLOYEE VOICE: EMPLOYEE SELF-EFFICACY AND SELF-IMPACT AS MEDIATORS.

LMX Differentiation and Voice Behavior: A Resource-Conservation Framework

To Voice or Not? the Role of Leader Power Base on Employees’ Response to LMX Differentiation

What Employees Can Get after They Voice Toward Their Supervisors?

Employee Work Performance Mediates Empowering Leader Behavior and Employee Voice

Why do employees speak up? Examining the roles of LMX, perceived risk and perceived leader power in predicting voice behavior

The Presence of a Feedback-Seeking Role Model in Promoting Employee Feedback Seeking: a Moderated Mediation Model

The Curvilinear Relationship Between Employee Voice and Managers’ Performance Evaluations: the Moderating Role of Voice Consensus