To Voice or Not? the Role of Leader Power Base on Employees’ Response to LMX Differentiation

Yanan Dong,Jing Jiang,Yan Rong,Baiyin Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2019.15799abstract
2019-01-01
Abstract:Drawing on conservation of resources (COR) theory, we examined how and when LMX differentiation influences voice behaviors. Based on a sample of 61 teams from an energy corporation in the People’s Republic of China, we tested a moderated mediation model. Specifically, we examined trust in leaders as a psychological pathway and leaders’ two types of power bases (reward power and coercive power) as moderators of the indirect LMX differentiation-voice behavior relationship. As predicted, our results showed that LMX differentiation was negatively related to employee trust in leaders, which in turn reduced employees’ willingness to engage in voice behaviors. Moreover, leader reward power negatively moderated the influence of LMX differentiation on employee trust in leaders such that the relationship was stronger when leader reward power was low but not significant when leader reward power was high. Leader coercive power positively moderated the relationship such that the relationship was stronger when leader coercive power was high but not significant when leader coercive power was low. The two types of power bases in turn moderated the indirect relationship between LMX differentiation and employee voice via employee trust in leaders. Finally, we discussed the implications of these findings in terms of how to promote employee voice in response to LMX differentiation. Organizations could establish training programs and launch reward systems to mitigate the negative effects of LMX differentiation on employee voice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?