Abstract:Deep neural networks have achieved significant success in the artificial intelligence community and various downstream tasks. They encode images or texts into dense feature representations and are supervised by a large amount of labeled data. Due to the expensiveness of high-quality labeled data, a huge number of easy-to-access instances are collected to conduct supervised learning. However, they have not been annotated by experts and thus can contain numerous noisy instances, which will degrade the performance. To learn robust feature representations despite misleading noisy labels, we employ supervised contrastive learning to directly perform supervision in the hidden space, rather than in the prediction space like the prevalent cross-entropy loss function. However, cutting-edge noisy label learning methods with supervised contrastive learning always discard the data considered to be noisy, and thus cannot tolerate high-ratio noisy datasets. Therefore, we propose a novel training strategy named Supervised Contrastive Learning with Corrected Labels (S cl ^2 ) to defend against the attack of noisy labels. S cl ^2 corrects the noisy labels with an empirical small-loss assumption and conducts supervised contrastive learning using these corrected data. Specifically, we employ the generated soft labels as supervisory information to facilitate our implementation of supervised contrastive learning. This expansion of contrastive learning ensures the integrity of the supervisory information while effectively enhancing the learning process. In addition, samples sharing the same soft labels are treated as positive sample pairs, while those with different soft labels are considered to be negative sample pairs. With this strategy, the representations from neural networks keep the local discrimination in one mini-batch. Besides, we also employ a prototype contrastive learning technique to ensure global discrimination. Our S cl ^2 has demonstrated excellent performance on numerous benchmark datasets, showcasing its effectiveness in various standardized evaluation scenarios. Additionally, our model has proven to be highly valuable when applied to real-world noisy datasets.

Counterexample Contrastive Learning for Spurious Correlation Elimination

Debiased Graph Contrastive Learning.

DCS: Debiased Contrastive Learning with Weak Supervision for Time Series Classification

Continual Learning in the Presence of Spurious Correlation

Less Learn Shortcut: Analyzing and Mitigating Learning of Spurious Feature-Label Correlation

Simple contrastive learning in a self-supervised manner for robust visual question answering

Bayesian Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning

Time-Series Contrastive Learning against False Negatives and Class Imbalance

Self-Damaging Contrastive Learning

CounterCLR: Counterfactual Contrastive Learning with Non-random Missing Data in Recommendation

HCCL: H ierarchical C ounterfactual C ontrastive L earning for Robust Visual Question Answering

Adversarial Supervised Contrastive Learning

Supervised contrastive learning with corrected labels for noisy label learning

Contrastive Learning with Negative Sampling Correction

Model-Aware Contrastive Learning: Towards Escaping the Dilemmas

Counterfactual Data Augmentation with Contrastive Learning

Debiased Contrastive Learning of Unsupervised Sentence Representations

SparseCL: Sparse Contrastive Learning for Contradiction Retrieval

Correct-N-Contrast: A Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious Correlations

Identifying Spurious Correlations using Counterfactual Alignment

Debiasing Counterfactuals In the Presence of Spurious Correlations