Abstract:Statistical disparity between distinct treatment groups is one of the most significant challenges for estimating Conditional Average Treatment Effects (CATE). To address this, we introduce a model-agnostic data augmentation method that imputes the counterfactual outcomes for a selected subset of individuals. Specifically, we utilize contrastive learning to learn a representation space and a similarity measure such that in the learned representation space close individuals identified by the learned similarity measure have similar potential outcomes. This property ensures reliable imputation of counterfactual outcomes for the individuals with close neighbors from the alternative treatment group. By augmenting the original dataset with these reliable imputations, we can effectively reduce the discrepancy between different treatment groups, while inducing minimal imputation error. The augmented dataset is subsequently employed to train CATE estimation models. Theoretical analysis and experimental studies on synthetic and semi-synthetic benchmarks demonstrate that our method achieves significant improvements in both performance and robustness to overfitting across state-of-the-art models.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### The problems the paper attempts to solve This paper attempts to solve the problem of significant statistical differences between different treatment groups when estimating Conditional Average Treatment Effects (CATE). Specifically, the author proposes a Counterfactual Data Augmentation with Contrastive Learning method, aiming to reduce the statistical differences between different treatment groups by reliably imputing the counterfactual results of selected individuals, thereby improving the performance and robustness of the CATE estimation model. ### Background and motivation 1. **The problem of statistical differences**: - Statistical differences between different treatment groups are a major challenge in CATE estimation. - Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) can alleviate this problem, but conducting RCTs may be expensive, unethical, or infeasible. - Therefore, observational studies are usually relied on, but these studies are vulnerable to selection bias. 2. **Data augmentation methods**: - The author proposes a model - independent data augmentation method, which contains two key steps: 1. Identify a subset of individuals for which counterfactual results can be reliably imputed. 2. Impute the counterfactual results of these selected individuals, thereby augmenting the original data set. 3. **Application of contrastive learning**: - Use contrastive learning to learn the representation space and similarity metric, so that in the learned representation space, similar individuals identified by the similarity metric have similar potential results. - This smoothing property ensures reliable imputation of counterfactual results for individuals with a sufficient number of neighboring individuals. ### Method overview 1. **Contrastive learning module**: - Train a classifier \( g_{\theta^*} \) to predict whether two individuals will have similar results when receiving the same treatment. - Train the classifier by constructing a positive sample set \( D^+ \) and a negative sample set \( D^- \). - The positive sample set \( D^+ \) contains pairs of similar individuals, and the negative sample set \( D^- \) contains pairs of dissimilar individuals. 2. **Local regression module**: - Use a local regression model \( \psi \) to impute the counterfactual results of selected individuals. - Explore two local regression models: linear regression and Gaussian Process (GP). - Estimate the counterfactual results of the target individual by selecting the measured results of neighboring individuals. ### Theoretical analysis 1. **Asymptotic analysis**: - Prove that the distribution of the COCOA method asymptotically converges to the distribution of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT). - Under the positivity assumption, as the amount of data increases, the probability of encountering neighboring data points becomes very high, thereby ensuring reliable imputation of counterfactual results. 2. **Generalization bounds**: - Provide theoretical guarantees for the generalization bounds of the hypothesis trained with the augmented data set. - The generalization bounds include three parts: the training loss on the augmented data set, the statistical similarity between the augmented data set and the RCT data set, and the accuracy of the data augmentation method. ### Experimental results 1. **Benchmark data sets**: - Experiments were carried out on benchmark data sets such as IHDP, News, and Twins. - The results show that the data set augmented by the COCOA method can significantly improve the performance of the CATE estimation model and effectively prevent overfitting. 2. **Preventing overfitting**: - The experimental results show that the performance of the model trained with the original data set decreases after exceeding the optimal stopping round, while the performance of the model trained with the augmented data set does not decrease. ### Summary This paper proposes a Counterfactual Data Augmentation with Contrastive Learning (COCOA) method. By reliably imputing the counterfactual results of selected individuals, it effectively reduces the statistical differences between different treatment groups and improves the performance and robustness of the CATE estimation model. The experimental results verify the effectiveness of this method.

Counterfactual Data Augmentation with Contrastive Learning

Boosting Unsupervised Contrastive Learning Using Diffusion-Based Data Augmentation from Scratch

Counterfactual Adversarial Learning with Representation Interpolation

On Counterfactual Data Augmentation Under Confounding

Solving the Class Imbalance Problem Using a Counterfactual Method for Data Augmentation

Implicit Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Robust Learning

Counterfactual Contrastive Learning for Robust Text Classification

Relation-based Counterfactual Data Augmentation and Contrastive Learning for Robustifying Natural Language Inference Models

PairCFR: Enhancing Model Training on Paired Counterfactually Augmented Data through Contrastive Learning

Counterfactual contrastive learning: robust representations via causal image synthesis

Rethinking the Augmentation Module in Contrastive Learning: Learning Hierarchical Augmentation Invariance with Expanded Views

Time Series Contrastive Learning with Information-Aware Augmentations

AD-AUG: Adversarial Data Augmentation for Counterfactual Recommendation

Leveraging Variation Theory in Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Optimized Active Learning

Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Counterfactual-Based Data Augmentation

MetAug: Contrastive Learning via Meta Feature Augmentation

Parametric Augmentation for Time Series Contrastive Learning

Implicit Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Deep Neural Networks.

Adaptive Data Augmentation for Contrastive Learning

Tabular Data Contrastive Learning via Class-Conditioned and Feature-Correlation Based Augmentation

Multi-CATE: Multi-Accurate Conditional Average Treatment Effect Estimation Robust to Unknown Covariate Shifts