Diagnostic Model for Predicting Hyperuricemia Based on Alterations of the Gut Microbiome in Individuals with Different Serum Uric Acid Levels

Meiting Liang,Jingkun Liu,Wujin Chen,Yi He,Mayina Kahaer,Rui Li,Tingting Tian,Yezhou Liu,Bing Bai,Yuena Cui,Shanshan Yang,Wenjuan Xiong,Yan Ma,Bei Zhang,Yuping Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.925119
IF: 6.055
2022-01-01
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Abstract:Background We aimed to assess the differences in the gut microbiome among participants with different uric acid levels (hyperuricemia [HUA] patients, low serum uric acid [LSU] patients, and controls with normal levels) and to develop a model to predict HUA based on microbial biomarkers. Methods We sequenced the V3-V4 variable region of the 16S rDNA gene in 168 fecal samples from HUA patients (n=50), LSU patients (n=61), and controls (n=57). We then analyzed the differences in the gut microbiome between these groups. To identify gut microbial biomarkers, the 107 HUA patients and controls were randomly divided (2:1) into development and validation groups and 10-fold cross-validation of a random forest model was performed. We then established three diagnostic models: a clinical model, microbial biomarker model, and combined model. Results The gut microbial α diversity, in terms of the Shannon and Simpson indices, was decreased in LSU and HUA patients compared to controls, but only the decreases in the HUA group were significant (P=0.0029 and P=0.013, respectively). The phylum Proteobacteria (P<0.001) and genus Bacteroides (P=0.02) were significantly increased in HUA patients compared to controls, while the genus Ruminococcaceae_Ruminococcus was decreased (P=0.02). Twelve microbial biomarkers were identified. The area under the curve (AUC) for these biomarkers in the development group was 84.9% (P<0.001). Notably, an AUC of 89.1% (P<0.001) was achieved by combining the microbial biomarkers and clinical factors. Conclusions The combined model is a reliable tool for predicting HUA and could be used to assist in the clinical evaluation of patients and prevention of HUA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?