Combining deep flooding and slow-release urea to reduce ammonia emission from rice fields
Yang Yang,Na Li,Xiaoyu Ni,Lixiang Yu,Ye Yang,Qi Wang,Jing Liu,Yafeng Ye,Liangzhi Tao,Binmei Liu,Yuejin Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118745
IF: 11.1
2020-01-01
Journal of Cleaner Production
Abstract:<p>The high risk of ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) emission from rice fields limits the efficient and cleaner production of rice (<em>Oryza sativa</em> L.). Currently, little is known about the combined effects of irrigation and fertilization on NH<sub>3</sub> emission from rice fields. Specially, the contributions of different field factors to NH<sub>3</sub> emission and the role of the rice canopy in NH<sub>3</sub> emission are not fully understood. This study aimed to (i) determine the best combination of irrigation and fertilization for reducing NH<sub>3</sub> emission from rice fields and (ii) elucidate the mechanisms involved based on the data from 17 field factors. A 2-year field experiment (2017 and 2018) was performed consisting of nine treatments: the full combination of three irrigation treatments (deep flooding (DF), moderate flooding (MF), and shallow flooding (SF)) and three fertilization treatments (the control test (N0), urea (U), and slow-release urea (SU)). The results indicated that nitrogen (N) application significantly increased NH<sub>3</sub> emission from rice fields (<em>p</em> < 0.05). The best practice for reducing NH<sub>3</sub> emission was the combination of DF and SU. Surface water pH, c(NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>), and the c(NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>)/c(H<sup>+</sup>) ratio should be controlled at low levels to reduce NH<sub>3</sub> emission. Ammonia emission under DF and SU decreased, largely because of the lower c(NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>), pH, and c(NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>)/c(H<sup>+</sup>) ratio in the surface water. According to the role of the rice canopy in NH<sub>3</sub> emission, the rice growing season can be divided into four periods. When considering the whole rice growing season, the rice canopy was a NH<sub>3</sub> sink. Ammonia flux in the canopy (AFlux<sub>canopy</sub>) was low and contributed little to NH<sub>3</sub> emission above the canopy (AE<sub>canopy</sub>); however, it may be used as an indicator to assess rice yield potentials. Overall, the combination of DF and SU led to lower NH<sub>3</sub> emission and higher grain yield, water productivity, and N recovery efficiency; hence, this is a promising practice for the efficient and cleaner production of rice.</p>
environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental