Effects of controlled-release fertilizer on rice grain yield, nitrogen use efficiency, and greenhouse gas emissions in a paddy field with straw incorporation

Huifeng Sun,Sheng Zhou,Jining Zhang,Xianxian Zhang,Cong Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107814
IF: 5.8
2020-08-01
Field Crops Research
Abstract:The incorporation of crop straw to cropland is increasingly being recommended due to its ability to improve soil fertility. Controlled-release fertilizer could enhance nitrogen (N) use efficiency and crop grain yield in a rice–wheat rotation cropping system. The effects of controlled-release fertilizer with wheat straw incorporation on rice grain yield and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is poorly understood. Four treatments, i.e., chemical fertilizer (CF), chemical fertilizer with straw incorporation (CF + WS), controlled-release urea with straw incorporation (CRU + WS), and no fertilizer (C), were applied to investigate the effects of CRU + WS on rice grain yield, N use efficiency and GHG emissions in multiple rice growing seasons. Relative to CF, rice grain yield from CF + WS decreased by 0.4–2.3% in 2012 and 2013 seasons but increased by 2.3–4.0% in 2014 and 2015 seasons, and significantly enhanced by 9.3% in 2016 season (p < 0.05). No significant difference in N use efficiency was observed between CF and CF + WS in any season, although the trend in that followed the similar pattern as rice grain yield when compared CF + WS with CF. CRU + WS significantly increased rice grain yield by 6.8–18.2% (p < 0.05) and enhanced N use efficiency by 42.0–150.5% (p < 0.05) compared to CF + WS. CH4 emissions from CF + WS and CRU + WS were comparable with each other, which were greatly higher by 156.8–358.6% and by 163.7–364.9% than that from CF, respectively. CF + WS had the potential to reduce N2O emission relative to CF in most rice growing seasons, whereas CRU + WS greatly stimulated N2O emission by 153.0–399.3% and 41.5–319.4% compared to CF and CF + WS, respectively. The GHG emission intensity (GHGI), calculated from greenhouse gases (CH4 and N2O) emissions and rice grain yield from CRU + WS were comparable with that from CF + WS in all rice growing seasons, and they enhanced the GHGI by 165.6–197.7% and by 128.0–253.1% relative to CF, respectively. In conclusion, in the paddy fields with wheat straw incorporation, the application of CRU, rather than conventional CF, could remarkably enhance rice grain yield, improve N use efficiency, but have little effect on GHGI due to its stimulation in N2O emission. More efforts are required to mitigate N2O emission when CRU is used in the future.
agronomy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?