Reporting Guidelines for Surgical Technique: A Scoping Review and a Call for Action

Qianling Shi,Yanfang Ma,Xianzhuo Zhang,Panpan Jiao,Kaiping Zhang,Leandro Cardoso Barchi,Benedetta Bedetti,Jinlin Wu,Benjamin Wei,Calvin S.H. Ng,Alper Toker,Jianfei Shen,Robert Fruscio,Sebastien Gilbert,Rene Horsleben Petersen,Steven Hochwald,Tomaž Štupnik,Hussein Elkhayat,Marco Scarci,Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri,Firas Abu Akar,Ryuichi Waseda,Alan D. L. Sihoe,Alfonso Fiorelli,Michel Gonzalez,Fabio Davoli,Grace S. Li,Xueqin Tang,Bin Qiu,Stephen D. Wang,Yaolong Chen,Shugeng Gao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4166363

2022-01-01

Abstract:Objective: To identify reporting guidelines related to surgical technique and propose recommendations for areas that require improvement.Study Design and Setting: A protocol-guided scoping review was conducted. A literature search of MEDLINE, the EQUATOR Network Library, Google Scholar, and Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations was conducted to identify surgical technique reporting guidelines published up to December 31, 2021. Descriptive analysis was used to provide the basic characteristics, development process, and reporting items of the retrieved guidelines.Results: Of the 55 surgical technique reporting guidelines included, 29 (52.7%) were published before 2010. Of the 11 clinical specialties covered by these guidelines, vascular surgery (n=18, 32.7%) was most common. A detailed development process was provided by 14 (25.5%) guidelines. The included guidelines generally showed a low degree of international and multidisciplinary cooperation. Few guidelines included a systematic literature review (n=13, 23.6%), used the Delphi method (n=4, 7.3%), or describe their post-publication strategy (n=6, 10.9%). The vast majority guidelines focused on the intraoperative period (n=50, 90.9%). Of the guidelines requiring detailed descriptions of surgical technique methodology (n=43, 78.2%), most failed to provide guidance on what constitutes an adequate description.Conclusions: As the number of surgical technique papers increases, so does the number of related reporting guidelines. However, our study demonstrates significant deficiencies in the development methodology and practicality of current guidelines. A standardized reporting guideline that is developed rigorously and focuses on details of surgical technique may serve as a necessary impetus for change.