Playing it Ethical or Safe? Exploring Earnings Management by Military Executives

Yekun Xu,Yameng Zhang,Guangyuan Ma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2022.13129abstract

2022-01-01

Academy of Management Proceedings

Abstract:The majority of studies argue that military experience makes executives more ethical and then reduces firms’ misconducts. What remains unclear is whether this is due to higher ethical values of ex-military executives or their preference in “playing it safe”. We propose that executives depend more on risk-aversion preference than their ethical values when making earnings management decisions. This is because the ethicality of earnings management is ambiguous and thus military executives may not perceive it as unethical. By examining a sample of 2,135 listed firms in China, a risk-avoidance culture (2006?2018), our results find military executives reduce higher-risk method (i.e., accrual-based earnings management) but increase lower-risk method (i.e., real earnings management). In a post-hoc test, we find that this risk-aversion characteristic is still significant when the external environment is subject to less litigation or auditing risk, and corporate risk-taking level mediates the effects of military experience on earnings management.