Abstract:Background: Immediate implant placement (IIP) has been associated with a higher risk of esthetic complications and particularly buccal mucosal recession, which can be more pronounced in non-intact sockets or in the presence of thin phenotype in the esthetic zone. Nevertheless, multiple techniques have been published to address IIP in non-intact alveolar sockets with favorable outcomes. The purpose of this study is to present an approach on IIP in sites with buccal bone dehiscence. Methods: Three patients requiring extraction of one or multiple teeth in the presence of buccal bone dehiscence were treated with flapless extractions, IIP, guided bone regeneration (GBR), and connective tissue grafting (CTG) through a tunneling approach with a simultaneous use of custom healing abutments. Results: All sites exhibited 1-2 mm of buccal bone thickness at the level of the implant platform, as well as significant buccal soft tissue thickness with no recession and a favorable development of the emergence profile at 4 months to a year post implant placement. Conclusions: IIP in sockets with buccal bone dehiscence can be managed by means of a flapless extraction, GBR and CTG through a tunneling approach exhibiting favorable hard and soft tissue responses. Key points: When placing immediate implants in non-intact sockets, simultaneous connective tissue grafting is recommended, especially in the esthetic zone. Bone grafting in immediate implants in sockets with buccal bone dehiscence can be performed through a tunneling approach without the need for open flap approaches. Placement of CHAs over immediate implants may help promote maintenance of the buccolingual ridge contours and overall hard and soft tissue responses. Plain language summary: Placing dental implants right after tooth extraction can lead to more visible aesthetic issues, especially gum recession. This is more common when the tooth socket is not intact or the gum tissue is thin. However, several techniques have shown good results even in these challenging situations. This study explores a method for implant placement right after tooth extraction in cases where there is bone missing on the socket. Three patients who needed teeth extracted and had bone loss on the outer side of their tooth sockets were treated. The treatment included: Extracting the teeth without cutting the gums, placing implants immediately, using GBR to help regrow bone, adding connective tissue grafts, and using custom healing cups to shape the gum tissue. After treatment, all the sites showed 1-2 mm of new bone on the outer side of the implants and thicker gum tissue without any recession. The gum and bone around the implants looked good 4 months to a year later. In conclusion, IIP in sockets with bone loss on the outer side can be effectively managed with this method, leading to good bone and gum tissue outcomes.

Immediate Implant Placement with Simultaneous Bone Augmentation Versus Delayed Implant Placement Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Clinical and Radiographic Study.

EFFECTS OF POST-EXTRACTION ALVEOLAR RIDGE PRESERVATION VERSUS IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.

Variations in Soft and Hard Tissues following Immediate Implant Placement versus Delayed Implant Placement following Socket Preservation in the Maxillary Esthetic Region: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Immediate implant placement with immediate or delayed provisionalization in the maxillary aesthetic zone: A 10‐year randomized trial

Immediate implant placement in extraction sockets with buccal bone dehiscence: A case study

Immediate Implant Placement with Different Interradicular Osteotomies in the Mandible: A Randomized Clinical Study

Early implant placement with or without alveolar ridge preservation in single tooth gaps renders similar esthetic, clinical and patient-reported outcome measures: One-year results of a randomized clinical trial

Immediate implant placement with platelet rich fibrin as space filling material versus deproteinized bovine bone in maxillary premolars: A randomized clinical trial

Does Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin Combined With Autogenous Demineralized Dentine Enhance Alveolar Ridge Preservation? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Evaluation of implants placed in preserved sockets versus fresh sockets on tissue preservation and esthetics：Meta-analysis and systematic review

Immediate implant placement in damaged extraction sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Immediate single-tooth implant placement in bony defect sites: A 10-year randomized controlled trial

Tissue changes around dental implants installed in alveolar ridge preservation sites: A 1‐year follow‐up randomized controlled clinical trial

Immediate implant placement into posterior sockets with or without buccal bone dehiscence defects: A retrospective cohort study.

Immediate versus delayed implant placement after anterior single tooth extraction: the timing randomized controlled clinical trial

Evaluation of soft tissue and labial plate of bone stability with immediate implant in direct contact versus gap with socket shield: A randomized clinical trial with 1 year follow-up

Single Immediate Implant Placement with Provisional Crown in the Esthetic Zone with 6 Years Follow-Up

Immediate implant and socket preservation using sticky bone and leukocyte-platelet-rich fibrin in the anterior maxilla: A 3-year case report

Alveolar ridge preservation versus early implant placement in single non‐molar sites: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

The efficiency of using advanced platelet rich fibrin–Autogenous bone graft mixture around immediately placed dental implants in mandibular molar region: (Randomized controlled clinical trial)

Feasibility of Immediate, Early and Delayed Implant Placement for Single Tooth Replacement in the Premaxilla: A Retrospective Cone‐Beam Computed Tomography Study of 100 Cases