Arabi(ci)sation and Counter-peripheralisation

Chaoqun Lian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449946.003.0004

2020-01-01

Abstract:This chapter explores the ALA discourse on Arabi(ci)sation (taʿrīb). Arabi(ci)sation was formulated as a language-policy response to the spread of foreign languages in Arab society - a language situation that was thought to weaken the national and international status of Arabic and bring foreignness into the corpus of the language. Yet this linguistic ‘predicament’ was part of the overall peripheralisation of the Arabs in the modern world-system. In this context, what were considered to be foreign threats to Arabic became refractions of the ‘sufferings’ of the Arabs under the dominant Other in the world-system. The ALA discourse on Arabi(ci)sation, accordingly, needed to confront the peripherality of both the language and the people. This chapter shows that the ALA discourse on Arabi(ci)sation served two symbolic functions. On the one hand, it offered a way for the symbolic resistance to the peripheralisation of both Arabic and the Arabs. On the other hand, it kept alive, in the context of continuing peripheralisation, the Arabs’ aspiration for self-empowerment and their vision of a more equilibrial and balanced international order than the order found at present, to counterbalance the powerful Other in the modern world-system.