Significant Effect of Carbon‐Ion Radiation Therapy Combined With Androgen Deprivation on Biochemical Recurrence Rates in High‐Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Two‐Center Controlled Trial Compare With X‐Ray External Beam Radiation Therapy
Xue Zhao,Shinichi Sakamoto,Hitoshi Ishikawa,Yasutaka Yamada,Shuri Aoki,Mio Nakajima,Kodai Sato,Kana Kobayashi,Shinpei Saito,Masaru Wakatsuki,Tomohiko Ichikawa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24818
2024-11-05
The Prostate
Abstract:Objective To compare the effects of carbon‐ion radiation therapy (CIRT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) on the prognosis of patients with prostate cancer. Methods The effects of initial prostate‐specific antigen (iPSA), clinical Tumor (cT) stage, radiotherapy method, and other clinical factors on the prognosis of 577 patients with radiotherapy were analyzed. Results Cox regression analysis showed that CIRT (RR: 0.49, p = 0.0215), cT stage ≥ 3 (RR: 2.72, p = 0.0003), and iPSA ≥ 16 ng/mL (RR: 1.74, p = 0.0347) were independent predictors of biochemical recurrence (BCR). After propensity score matching (PSM), CIRT (RR: 0.42, p = 0.0147), cT stage ≥ 3 (RR: 2.55, p = 0.0092), and iPSA ≥ 16 ng/mL (RR: 2.12, p = 0.0366) were still the predictors of univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, CIRT (RR: 0.42, p = 0.015) and cT stage≥ 3 (RR:2.21, p = 0.0332) were independent predictors of BCR. Among them, we used iPSA and cT stages to establish a new radiotherapy selection model based on BCR risk. Patients who met more than one factor (score ≥ 1) and underwent CIRT had significantly better BCR progression‐free survival (PFS) than those who received EBRT (p ≤ 0.01). This was also confirmed by Kaplan–Meier analysis after PSM. Conclusion CIRT patients exhibited lower 5‐year BCR rates compared to the EBRT group. Patients with a risk score of our model ≥ 1 undergoing CIRT were more likely to experience BCR benefits compared to those receiving EBRT.
endocrinology & metabolism,urology & nephrology