The Aesthetics of Collective Writing: A Chinese/Western Collective Essay

Michael A. Peters,Petar Jandric,Ruyu Hung,Marek Tesar,Huajun Zhang,Chengbing Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2094765
2022-01-01
Educational Philosophy and Theory
Abstract:The ancient concept of ‘self-cultivation’ with its roots in Confucianism and Hellenistic philosophy can also be utilised as tool for understanding the practices of collective writing and open review as part of a ‘knowledge socialism’. ‘Self-cultivation’ understood in terms of writing as a combination of ascetic and technological practices have ethical and aesthetic power to reconstitute the academic author, writer and scholar. Increasingly, academic writing is controlled through new digital writing technologies (NDWT) configuring a new ‘techno-aesthetics’: as a ‘technology of the self ’ academic writing is governed by new rules and relations of power of new digital technologies and digital text production (hypertext, computer-aided writing, grammar and spell check, search engines, copy-paste-edit, plagiarism detection, etc). Collective writing can be understood as a new model of text production that generates new ethical, legal and pedagogical issues around the notions of ‘author’, ‘journal article’ and ‘intellectual property’. The techno-aesthetics of collective writing are ‘moral technologies’: both the academic author and its ‘genres’ have passed through various stages and styles connecting self-cultivation and the contingent development of academic writing. The style of ‘objective’
What problem does this paper attempt to address?