Abstract:Scholars in the humanities rely on carefully-constructed prose to convey ideas, while many in the sciences deploy numerical precision instead. Although university administrators often tout multi- or inter-discipinarity, it is unclear whether there is a deep understanding of how these modes of investigation are different, and how those differences might be accommodated and supported. For example, the disciplines that use numbers as a chief mode of expression were from the beginning conceived, embodied with and configured for external assessment as part of their claims to authority. As a consequence, their metrics were not designed to assess other kinds of scholarship such as that of the arts and the humanities. And, read in the opposite direction, the fact that the humanities were never customised for those numerical-based controls should not be understood as a failing of the discipline, but as an integral dimension of its distinct practice. This contribution offers a study of documentary form in the academy. The discussion will examine how scholarship in different fields came to have different formal features. It will furthermore consider what the implications of these differences are for how the disciplines are now seen and assessed. By looking to the history and traditions of different forms of scholarship, this chapter seeks to offer insight into the current debates about how productivity and impact are to be defined, marked and assessed in the academy. This chapter introduces the possibility that humanistic research might be expressed in word or wood and investigates the consequences of such a provocation. It concerns itself with select dimensions of scholarly publication that are especially apparent from a perspective across wood and word-among them, peer review, assessment, dissemination, citation and ownership. Under the intensifying exigencies of documentation, components of the written document that were once provisional become obligatory and codified through practice. The foregoing discussion of a historically informed experiment in academic publishing raises for consideration how specific practices of knowledge have been legitimised over time. The moments of friction encountered by the Cabinet, Box and Article provide clues about how certain forms of knowledge gain traction over time. Conceiving publications as unique performances of meaning may stimulate alternative strategies of assessment, interpretation and dissemination that are cognisant of—and work in concert with—the diverse forms at issue.

Collective Writing: the Continuous Struggle for Meaning-Making

Exploring the philosophy and practice of collective writing

Collaborative International Nursing Writing Group: A Nonpatriarchal Approach

Using a Process of Collective Biography Writing in Higher Education to Develop an Ability to Explore, Reveal and Critically Reflect

Collective Creativity and Innovation: An Interdisciplinary Review, Integration, and Research Agenda

Working at the Wonder: Collaborative Writing as Method of Inquiry

Exploitation and exploration in text evolution. Quantifying planning and translation flows during writing

In wood and word, or, a gloss on documents and documentation in the humanities

Creating comics, songs and poems to make sense of decolonising the curriculum: a collaborative autoethnography patchwork

Self-Knowledge Creation Through Collective Poetic Inquiry: Cultivating Productive Resistance as University Academics

The Wisdom of the Collective: an Integrated Multi-Level Framework of Shared Leadership in Engineering Management Project Teams

Marrying Collective Wisdom: Researcher-practitioner Collaboration in Developing ELT Textbooks

Supporting student writing and other modes of learning and assessment: a staff guide

From Bubbles to Foam, A Nomadic Interpretation of Collaborative Publishing: A Review of Jorge Lucero and Colleagues’ Article in Art Education

Academic Publishing: Making the Implicit Explicit

Reflections on Collective Collections

Read, write, retreat: a collaborative reflection on shared writing retreat experiences among PhD candidates

Collaborative writing for clinical educators: recommendations from a community of scholars

Computer-mediated collaborative writing in L2 contexts: an analysis of empirical research

Philosophy of Education in a New Key: East Asia

“We Cannot Write About Complicity Together”: Limits of Cross-Caste Collaborations in Western Academy