Abstract:Abstract Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy via biventricular pacing (BVP) is an established therapy for patients with heart failure. Recently, it has been shown that left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is feasible and may also improve clinical outcomes. In this article, we describe a new technique (sequential LBBAP followed by coronary sinus pacing, designated LOT-CRT) and assess the feasibility of LOT-CRT.Methods: The database of all patients with adaptive CRT from single centre was reviewed retrospectively. The eligible patients were divided into two groups, LOT-CRT and BV-CRT. The LBBAP lead implanted using our methods. The QRS duration (QRSd) was measured at baseline and during LBBAP, BVP, and LOT-CRT.Results: The study enrolled 17 consecutive heart failure patients with LBBB. LBBAP failed in 1 patient, succeed in 8 patients, while CS leads were implanted successfully in all patients. At baseline, the two groups (8 cases in LOT-CRT group, 9 cases in BV-CRT group) were matched for QRSd and ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM, 5 cases in LOT-CRT group, 4 cases in BV-CRT group). In LOT-CRT group, BVP resulted in significant reduction of the QRSd from 158.0 ± 13.0 ms at baseline to 132.0 ± 4.5 ms (P=0.019). Compared with BVP, unipolar LBBAP resulted in further reduction of the QRSd to 123.0 ± 5.7 ms (P < 0.01). However, LOT-CRT with adaptive algorithm resulted in a significantly greater reduction of the QRSd to 117.0 ± 6.7 ms (P < 0.01). In BV-CRT group, BVP resulted in significant reduction of the QRSd from 176.7 ±19.7 ms at baseline to 143.3 ±8.2 ms (P=0.011). However, compared with LOT-CRT, BVP has no any advantage in reducing QRSd (P >0.05). As compared to the baseline after 3 months of LBBAP, patients in LOT-CRT group showed significant improvement in LVEF and NT-proBNP levels (P < 0.01), while patients in BV-CRT group showed non-significant changes in these parameters (P >0.05).Conclusions: The study demonstrates that LOT-CRT is clinically feasible in patients with systolic HF and LBBB. LOT-CRT was associated with significant narrowing of the QRSd and improvement in LV function, especially in patients with ICM.

Preliminary experience on left bundle branch pacing-optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy for chronic heart failure

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block

Feasibility and Outcomes of Upgrading to Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients with Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy and Infranodal Atrioventricular Block.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patients by Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Electrophysiological Insights into Three Modalities of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients Indicated for Pacing Therapy

Clinical Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

Anatomical and Histological Assessment of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Human Heart with Refractory Heart Failure

A preliminary study of left bundle branch pacing in patients with chronic heart failure and left bundle branch block with mildly decreased left ventricular ejection fraction

Feasibility and Efficacy of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients Indicated for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Long-term Outcomes of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Complete Left Bundle Branch Block

Left bundle branch area pacing: A promising modality for cardiac resynchronization therapy

Long-term efficacy of left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure complicated with left bundle branch block

Remarkable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing in patients with true left bundle branch block

Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing on Electrical Synchrony and Hemodynamics in Heart Failure Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block

Left Bundle Branch Conduction Recovery Following Left Bundle Branch Pacing in a Heart Failure Patient

Efficacy of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients: Select Site - Cohort Study

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Left-bundle-branch Area Pacing and Coronary Sinus Pacing

Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Acute Cardiac Resynchronization in Patients With Heart Failure

Resynchronization Effects and Clinical Outcomes During Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with and Without Conduction System Capture.

Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients with Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison with Biventricular Pacing.