Abstract:Introduction: The optimal treatment of choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis remains controversial. Common surgical methods vary among endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE), laparoscopic transductal common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) with or without T-tube drainage. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of surgical methods and to determine the appropriate procedure for patients with cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis. Methods: From January 2013 to January 2019, a total of 1555 consecutive patients diagnosed with cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis who underwent surgical treatment in Tongji Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Total 521 patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones underwent LC + LCBDE + T-Tube were excluded from the analysis. At last, 1034 patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into three groups according to their surgical methods: preoperative ERCP + subsequent LC (ERCP + LC group, n = 275), LC + LCBDE + intraoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) + primary duct closure (Tri-scope group, n = 479) and LC + laparoscopic transcystic CBD exploration (LTCBDE group, n = 280). Clinical records, operative findings and postoperative follow-up were collected and analyzed. Results: There was no mortality in three groups. Common bile duct (CBD) stone clearance rate was 97.5% in ERCP + LC group, 98.7% in Tri-scope group, and 99.3% in LTCBDE group. There were no difference in terms of demographic characteristics, biochemistry findings and presentations, but the Tri-scope group had the biggest diameter and amount of stones and diameter of CBD, the LTCBDE group had the least CBD stones and the biggest diameter of cystic gall duct (CGD). ERCP + LC group have the longest hospital stay (14.16 ± 3.88 days vs 6.92 ± 1.71 days vs 10.74 ± 5.30 days, P < 0.05), also has the longest operative time than others (126.08 ± 42.79 min vs 92.31 ± 10.26 min, 99.09 ± 8.46 min, P < 0.05). Compared to ERCP + LC group, LTCBDE group and Tri-scope group had lower postoperation-leukocyte, shorter surgery duration and hospital stay (P < 0.05). Compared to the Tri-scope group, the LTCBDE group had the shorter hospital stay, extubation time and operation time and less intraoperative bleeding. There were less postoperative complications in LTCBDE group (1.1%) compared to the ERCP + LC group (3.6%) and Tri-scope group (2.2%). Follow-up time was 6 to 72 months. Four patients in ERCP + LC group and 5 in Tri-scope group reported recurrent stones. Conclusion: All the three surgical methods are safe and effective. Tri-scope approach and LTCBDE approach have superiority to preoperative ERCP + LC. LC + LTCBDE shows priority over Tri-scope approach, but should be performed in selected patients. LC + LCBDE + T-Tube can be an alternative management if the other three procedures were failed. The surgeons should choose the most appropriate surgical procedure according to the preoperative examination results and intraoperative situation.

A New Operation for Gallstones: Choledochoscopic Gallbladder-Preserving Cholecystolithotomy, a Retrospective Study of 3,511 Cases.

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Combined with Intraoperative Cholangiography and Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for the Treatment of Choledocholithiasis

Intraoperative ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis

5-year retrospective analysis of laparoscopic combined choledochoscopic gallbladder-preserving cholelithotomy: with a report of 360 cases

A preliminary study of endoscopic trans-gastric gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy for cholecystolithiasis ( with video)

Laparoscopic gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy:Clinical analysis of 108 cases

[The Analysis of Follow-Up Results of 612 Cases of Cholecystolithiasis Treated with the Minimal Invasive Operation with Gallbladder Preserved Via Choledochoscopy].

Ultrasound-guided double-tract percutaneous cholecystostomy combined with a choledochoscope for performing cholecystolithotomies in high-risk surgical patients

Comparison of Cholecystectomy and Gallbladder-Preserving Cholecystolithotomy in Treatment of Gallstones

Long-Term Prognosis of Cholecystocholedocholithiasis in Chinese Population

Influence of Traditional Chinese Culture on the Choice of Patients Concerning the Technique for Treatment of Cholelithiasis: Cultural Background and Historical Origins of Gallbladder-Preserving Surgery.

Surgical methods of treatment for cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis: six years' experience of a single institution

Clinical Application of Choledochoscopy in Gallbladder Sparing Surgery

Minimally-invasive Operation with Gallbladder Preserved by Choledochoscopy in 33 Cases of Cholecystolithiasis with Nonvisualization of Gall Bladder in Preoperative ECT

Clinical analysis of endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis

Surgical Options for Retained Gallstones After Cholecystectomy

Effect of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Lithotomy Combined with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Pain and Prognosis of Patients with Gallstones and Extrahepatic Bile Duct Stones

Effect of Laparoscopy Combined with Choledochoscope for the Treatment of Cholecystolithiasis and Choledocholithiasis

Management Hepatolithiasis with Operative Choledochoscopic FREDDY Laser Lithotripsy Combined with or Without Hepatectomy

Clinical Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Fiberoptic Choledochoscopy versus Conventional Open Surgery for Gallbladder Stones Complicated with Common Bile Duct Stones

Treatment of Gallbladder Stone with Common Bile Duct Stones in the Laparoscopic Era