Abstract:Introduction: Choledocholithiasis is usually treated with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (CBDE) (LCBDE), or laparoscopic transcystic CBDE (LTCBDE). However, the comparative long-term prognosis of these methods in terms of adverse outcomes remains uncertain. Methods: In an ambispective, multicenter, observational, open cohort study, patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis underwent one of three treatments (EST+laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), LCBDE+LC, and LTCBDE+LC).The primary outcome was adverse outcomes. Results: At a median follow-up period of 2.72 years among 2708 patients, the adverse outcome rate is 9.3%. Compared with LCBDE and LTCBDE groups, EST group displayed an increased risk for adverse outcomes (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.93-1.69, P=0.146; HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.30-2.43, P<0.001) and stone-related outcomes (HR 1.43, 95% CI 0.99-2.06, P=0.054; HR 4.36, 95% CI 2.71-7.02, P<0.001) in the unadjusted Cox model. After adjustment in the multivariable analysis, EST group still displayed an increased risk of adverse outcomes (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.05-1.95, P=0.021; HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.35-2.59, P<0.001) and stone-related outcomes (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.13-2.37, P=0.010; HR 4.88, 95% CI 2.99-7.97, P<0.001). Compared with LTCBDE group, LCBDE group displayed an increased risk for a stone-related outcome in both the unadjusted Cox model (HR 3.05, 95% CI 1.89-4.90, P<0.001) and the adjusted multivariable analysis (HR 2.98, 95% CI 1.83-4.86, P <0.001). Conclusion: Compared with EST, the laparoscopic technique was associated with a lower risk of adverse outcomes and stone-related outcomes after adjustment for confounding factors. In laparoscopic techniques, the risk of stone-related outcomes after LTCBDE is reduced 66.4% than LCBDE. Clinical Trial Registration: CREST Choles ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02554097. Funding Statement: The author(s) disclose receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: this program is sponsored by Capital Health Research and Special Development (No. 2016-1-1111), National Key Technologies R&D Program (No. 2015BAI13B09), and Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubator Program (No. PX2016001 and No. PX2019004). Declaration of Interests: The author(s) declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Ethics Approval Statement: Ethical approval was obtained at all participating centers.

Influence of Traditional Chinese Culture on the Choice of Patients Concerning the Technique for Treatment of Cholelithiasis: Cultural Background and Historical Origins of Gallbladder-Preserving Surgery.

The comparative analysis between two methods for minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis

Intraoperative ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Combined with Intraoperative Cholangiography and Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for the Treatment of Choledocholithiasis

Comparison of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Combined with Intraoperative Endoscopic Sphincterotomy and Laparoscopic Exploration of the Common Bile Duct for Cholecystocholedocholithiasis

A New Operation for Gallstones: Choledochoscopic Gallbladder-Preserving Cholecystolithotomy, a Retrospective Study of 3,511 Cases.

Laparoscopic gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy:Clinical analysis of 108 cases

Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Traditional Laparoscopic Instruments: a Report of Thirty-Six Cases

Clinical Analysis of Cholecystolithiasis and Choledocholithiasis Treated by Laparoscopy Combined with Fibrocholedochoscope

Effect of Microscope Combined with Wechat Smart Platform on Clinical Efficacy and Gastrointestinal Function of Patients with Cholecystolithiasis Combined with Common Bile Duct Stones

Clinical Application of Choledochoscopy in Gallbladder Sparing Surgery

Endoscopic or laparoscopic approach for hepatolithiasis in the era of endoscopy in China

Treatment of Gallbladder Stone with Common Bile Duct Stones in the Laparoscopic Era

Minimal Invasive Therapy for Patients with Choledocholithiasis and Gallbladder Stone

The Clinical Application of Treating Cholelithiasis in a Mini-Invasive Operation out of the Peritoneal Cavity by Laparoscopy Combined with Choledochoscope for Preservation of Cholecyst and Removal of Calculus

Investigation on the life quality of post-operative patients with cholelithiasis

Long-Term Prognosis of Cholecystocholedocholithiasis in Chinese Population

Effect of Laparoscopy Combined with Choledochoscope for the Treatment of Cholecystolithiasis and Choledocholithiasis

Diagnosis and treatment of choledocholithiasis by laparoscopy combined with cholangioscopy

5-year retrospective analysis of laparoscopic combined choledochoscopic gallbladder-preserving cholelithotomy: with a report of 360 cases

Comparative Study between Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Traditional Open Surgery in Elderly Patients with Choledocholithiasis Complicated with Cholecystolithiasis