Comprehensive Risk and Uncertainty from Different Indices for Assessing Soil Heavy Metal Pollution in a Copper Mine Tailing Site

Hong Liu,Linmei Liu,Yanguo Teng,Nengzhan Zheng,Weifeng Yue,Yuanzheng Zhai,Jie Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4215227

2022-01-01

Abstract:A field survey was conducted in the surrounding area of an open tailings stack in Bayannur, Inner Mongolia. The contamination factor (CF), pollution load index (PLI), potential ecological risk index (RI), risk assessment code (RAC), modified potential ecological risk index (MRI) and human health risk assessment (HI) were introduced to assess the environmental and health risk levels of heavy metals including As, Cu, Pb and Zn in the study area, and the results were compared. The pollutant risk level assessed via CF decreased in order of Cu, Pb, As and Zn, while the risk level order was Cu, Zn, Pb and As according to RAC. The difference between assessment results based on content and specific fraction also behaved in composite indices as the risk level increased overall according to MRI compared with RI. Except for As, all chosen elements have no significant health risk to children and adults. Ingestion of soil containing tailings was the main exposure pathway causing noncarcinogenic risk. The studied site showed no health risk to adults, while 62.8% of all sampling points showed significant health risk to children. As the assessment results of PLI showed, all of the studied sites showed significant environmental risk, as nearly every sampling point had a PLI value higher than 1. This revealed the effect on site risk level determination made by assessment indices focusing on different assessment purposes. RAC and MRI should be preferred in ecological risk assessments for pasture, while HI is necessary for assessments focusing on human health. Because of the more conservative assessment results, HI rather than PLI was suggested to be introduced for environmental management guidance if there was no special requirement.