Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To investigate the possibility for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection to be a predictable signal for the carcinogenesis of oral mucosa by comparing the prevalences of HPV in each stage of oral mucosal carcinogenesis and to compare the sensitivity differences of the two methods in detecting HPV infection in oral cavity.METHODS:The hybrid capture (HC-II) was used to detect infection of HPV in 255 samples taken from 12 cases of healthy oral mucosa, 211 cases of patients with pathological diagnosis and 32 cases of patients with clinical diagnosis. The diagnosed cases included 8 cases of benign lesions of the oral mucosa, precancerous lesions [74 cases of oral leukoplakia (OLK) with hyperplasia and 42 cases of OLK with oral epithelial dysplasia (OED)], 91 cases of precancerous condition [oral lichen planus (OLP)] and 28 cases of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). And in situ hybridization (ISH) was used to detect infection of HPV in 33 cases of OSCC and 76 cases of OLK, including 30 cases of hyperplasia, 15 cases of mild OED, 15 cases of moderate OED and 16 cases of severe OED.RESULTS:The prevalence of HPV in OLP samples was higher (12.12%, 8/66) than that of OLK (2.59%, 3/116) (χ(2)=4.666, P=0.031) and OSCC(7.14%, 2/28, χ(2)=0.513, P=0.474). The prevalence of HPV in OSCC (7.14%, 2/28) was higher than that of OLK (2.59%, 3/116), and no significant difference was found. There was only one case of smoke spot and statistical analysis was not carried out. ISH was used to detect type 16/18 and type 31/33 HPV DNA in 109 cases of oral mucosal lesions in paraffin sections and only one case of OSCC was HPV positive. Thirty-seven cases were detected by HC-II and ISH methods at the same time. The same negative results by the two methods were found in 94.6% samples (35/37). In the other two samples, one was OSCC with early infiltration and the other was OLK with hyperplasia, The HC-II results were positive while the ISH results were negative. The patients with OLP and HPV testing results were followed up and the average follow-up period was (36.2 ± 10.5) months. It was found that three of them had a malignant transformation, and the malignant transformation rate of HPV positive patients was 12.50% (1/8), which was higher than that of HPV negative patients (3.45%, 2/58), and the difference was not statistically significant, P=0.249.CONCLUSION:HC-II assay was more sensitive in detecting HPV infection of oral mucosal lesions than ISH. The results of this study showed that there was insufficient evidence for taking HPV infection as a predictor of OLK carcinogenesis. Patients suffering from OLP were in a precancerous condition. The prevalence of HPV in OLP patients of this study was higher than that in OLK and OSCC patients, suggesting that for some reason, OLP patients were susceptible to HPV. HPV testing can be considered as routine in patients with OLP, and HC-II assay was recommended. And patients with OLP and HPV positive should be followed up regularly.

HPV related p16INK4A and HSV in benign and potentially malignant oral mucosa pathologies

Expression of Human Papillomavirus and the p16 Gene in Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders (OPMD): a Comparative Study With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

P16INK4A As a Surrogate Biomarker for Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Carcinoma: Consideration of Some Aspects.

Oral and periodontal manifestation related during human papilloma virus infections: Update on early prognostic factors

The Related Study of High Risk HPVI6、18 Infection and Expression of Multiple Genes in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas

Human Papillomavirus Genotypes and P16 Expression in Oral Leukoplakia and Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Double demonstration of oncogenic high risk human papilloma virus DNA and HPV-E7 protein in oral cancers

Human papillomavirus type 16 and 18 DNA in oral squamous cell carcinoma and normal mucosa.

Detection And Pathological Value Of Papillomavirus Dna And P16ink4a And P53 Protein Expression In Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Evaluation of HPV and EBV in OSCC and the expression of p53, p16, E-cadherin, COX-2, MYC, and MLH1

Does HPV play a role in the etiopathogenesis of ameloblastoma? An immunohistochemical, in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction study of 18 cases using laser capture microdissection

Feasibility of Immunohistochemical p16 Staining in the Diagnosis of Human Papillomavirus Infection in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

p16INK4A and p14ARF expression pattern by immunohistochemistry in human papillomavirus-related cervical neoplasia

[Determination of Human Papillomavirus in Oral Leukoplakia,oral Lichen Planus and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma].

Human papillomavirus-16 infection and p16 expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Expression of P53, Mdm2, P21, Heat Shock Protein 70, and Hpv 16/18 E6 Proteins in Oral Verrucous Carcinoma and Oral Verrucous Hyperplasia

Increased Ki-67 proliferative index and absence of P16INK4 in CIN-HPV related pathogenic pathways different from cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion

A study on H-score threshold for p16ink4a immunoperoxidase expression in squamous cell tumours of oral cavity

Global DNA Methylation Level in Tumour and Margin Samples in Relation to Human Papilloma Virus and Epstein–Barr Virus in Patients with Oropharyngeal and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas

Association of human papilloma virus in oral squamous cell carcinoma: An alarming need for human papillomavirus 16 screening in cancer patients

DETECTION OF P16/KI-67 MARKERS IN THE DETECTION OF CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA