Variable Extinction Angle Control Strategy Based on Virtual Resistance to Mitigate Commutation Failures in HVDC System.
Zhanhong Wei,Wanliang Fang,Jun Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2994245
IF: 3.9
2020-01-01
IEEE Access
Abstract:To mitigate commutation failures (CFs) and minimize the instability of HVDC systems due to AC faults or control mode ambiguity, a constant extinction voltage-time area based control strategy with virtual resistance is proposed. In this strategy, using sine-cosine components detector and considering zero-crossing phase shift of commutation voltage, the extinction angle setting value can be adjusted dynamically. Meanwhile, to reflect the characteristics of DC current during the fault and recovery process, a virtual resistance is introduced into the control system and DC voltage considering the voltage drop of the virtual resistance is taken as the input of voltage-dependent current order limiter (VDCOL). Through theoretical analysis, the proposed strategy not only reduces the firing angle dynamically, but also reduces DC current by lowering the current order on the rectifier side immediately when the AC voltage disturbance is detected, thereby further reducing the occurrence of CFs. Therefore, the control strategy can effectively suppress successive and intermittent CFs. The effectiveness of the proposed control strategy is verified by simulation of the single HVDC and multi-infeed HVDC model based on the CIGRE HVDC benchmark system, in which AC-DC current criterion of identifying CF and suppression ratio index are adopted. The simulation results show that the proposed control strategy can effectively mitigate CFs under single-phase and three-phase faults to a certain extent. Comparing with the existing control strategies based on controller modification, i.e. commutation failure prevention, DC current predictive control, smooth logic switching control and DC current limitation control strategy based on virtual resistance, the proposed control strategy is superior in mitigation effects. The average suppression rates of these strategies are 1.66%, 3.21%, 6.11%, 3.35%, and 8.33% under single-phase fault, respectively; with the rates of 1.4%, 2.72%, 4.97%, 0%, and 6.8% under three-phase fault, respectively.