Abstract:3599 Background: Tislelizumab (TIS), an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody, demonstrated improved anti-tumor response and tolerable safety in patients (pts) with previously treated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability high/deficient mismatch repair (MSI-H/dMMR) solid tumors, including colorectal cancer (CRC; NCT03736889). Recent studies of other anti-PD-1 antibodies indicate potential clinical benefit of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy in pts with resectable MSI-H/dMMR CRC. Here, we report efficacy and safety outcomes of neoadjuvant TIS from a multicenter phase II trial (NCT05116085) in this population. Methods: Pts aged ≥18 years with stage II/III MSI-H/dMMR CRC, ECOG PS 0-1, evaluable disease per RECIST v1.1, and eligible for R0 (complete) resection were enrolled. Pts received TIS 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for 3 cycles followed by surgical resection within 10 weeks of first TIS dose. The primary endpoint was major pathological response (MPR) rate (proportion of pts with ≤10% residual viable tumor in the surgically resected primary tumor). Secondary endpoints included pathological complete response (pCR) rate (proportion of pts with absence of residual tumor in the surgically resected specimen), and safety. The R0 resection rate was an exploratory endpoint. Results: Overall, 33 pts were enrolled across eight sites in China. The median age of enrolled pts was 52.0 years (range: 23-84), 14 (42.4%) pts were male. Ten (30.3%) pts had rectal cancer and 23 (69.7%) colon cancer. At study entry, clinical tumor (T) stage was reported as T2, T3, and T4 in 1 (3.0%), 7 (21.2%), and 25 (75.8%) pts, respectively, and node (N) stage as N0, N1, and N2 in 6 (18.2%), 14 (42.4%), and 13 (39.4%) pts, respectively. All pts had a metastasis (M) stage of M0. A total of 29 (87.9%) pts underwent surgery and were evaluable for efficacy endpoints. Surgery was not performed in 4 pts, 3 of whom were managed non-operatively (1 pt had progressive disease). MPR and pCR rates were 89.7% and 62.1%, respectively (Table). Any-grade and grade ≥3 TIS-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 20 (60.6%) and 1 (3.0%) pts, respectively. Two (6.1%) pts experienced serious TRAEs; no TRAEs led to death or surgery cancellation. One pt (3.0%) experienced a TRAE (grade 2 hypothyroidism) leading to surgery delay. No grade ≥3 or serious TIS-related surgery-relevant adverse events were reported. Immune-mediated adverse events were reported in 10 (30.3%) pts (all grade 1-2). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant TIS was associated with high MPR and pCR rates and an acceptable safety profile, and did not compromise surgery in pts with resectable MSI-H/dMMR CRC. Clinical trial information: NCT05116085 . [Table: see text]

A Phase III, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ceftolozane/tazobactam Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem in Chinese Participants with Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections.

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Plus Metronidazole for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections in an Era of Multidrug Resistance: Results From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Trial (ASPECT-cIAI)

Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection: Results From a Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Program

Efficacy and Safety of Tigecycline Monotherapy Vs. Imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese Patients with Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections: a Randomized Controlled Trial

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Comparison Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Tigecycline to Imipenem/cilastatin to Treat Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections in Hospitalized Subjects in China

A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Ceftolozane/Tazobactam to Standard of Care in the Management of Neutropenia and Fever in Patients with Hematological Malignancies.

Ceftazidime/Avibactam versus Polymyxin B in the Challenge of Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Pseudomonas</i> aeruginosa Infection

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial on Teicoplanin Versus Vancomycin

A Single- and Multiple-Dose Study to Characterize the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Ceftolozane/tazobactam in Healthy Chinese Participants

A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Oral Sitafloxacin Versus Moxifloxacin In Adult Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Ceftolozane-tazobactam versus meropenem for definitive treatment of bloodstream infection due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales ("MERINO-3"): study protocol for a multicentre, open-label randomised non-inferiority trial

A Phase III Multicentre, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Contezolid Versus Linezolid in Adults with Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections.

The efficacy and safety of eravacycline compared with current clinically common antibiotics in the treatment of adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Controlled, Phase 3 Clinical Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Nemonoxacin Malate Versus Levofloxacin for Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adult Patients

Ertapenem Prophylaxis of Surgical Site Infections in Elective Colorectal Surgery in China: a Multicentre, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study.

Preoperative (neoadjuvant) Therapy with Tislelizumab for Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer with High Microsatellite Instability or Deficient Mismatch Repair: an Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multicenter Phase II Study.

Efficacy and safety of miconazole muco-adhesive tablet versus itraconazole in oropharyngeal candidiasis: A randomized, multi-centered, double-blind, phase 3 trial

Ceftolozane/tazobactam versus meropenem in patients with ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia: subset analysis of the ASPECT-NP randomized, controlled phase 3 trial

A multi-centric randomized controlled trial of sequential intravenous moxifloxacin in comparison to cefoperazone-sulbactam for the treatment of acute biliary tract infection

Patient outcomes by baseline pathogen resistance phenotype and genotype in CERTAIN-1, a Phase 3 study of cefepime-taniborbactam versus meropenem in adults with complicated urinary tract infection

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam for the Treatment of Complicated Infections in Hospital Settings—A French Real-world Study