Yield of endocervical curettage in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher during colposcopy: A prospective, cross‐sectional study

Nida Jareemit,Lalita Theerarojanapong,Natthawadee Laokulrath,Vuthinun Achariyapota,Khemanat Khemworapong,Sompop Kuljarasnont,Pornporm Ittiamornlert,Vitcha Poonyakanok,Perapong Inthasorn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16074
2024-12-07
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Abstract:Objective This study assessed the prevalence and factors associated with detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) via endocervical curettage (ECC) during colposcopy. Methods Between December 2020 and September 2023, a prospective, cross‐sectional study involving women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results who underwent colposcopy was conducted. ECC was performed via a Kevorkian endocervical curette following colposcopy‐directed biopsy. The exclusion criteria were glandular cytology abnormalities, pregnancy, post‐hysterectomy status, and cervical cancer. Results The study included 569 women, with a mean age of 41.6 ± 11.7 years. Among the participants, 78.9% presented with low‐grade cytology, whereas 21.1% presented with high‐grade cytology. All of the patients underwent ECC, with 0.4% (two patients) yielding inadequate samples. ECC detected CIN2+ lesions in 11.6% of the patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 9–14.3). Univariable analysis revealed that age, menopausal status, history of CIN2+, high‐grade cytology, and high‐grade colposcopy impression were significant factors for CIN2+ detection by ECC. Multivariable analysis confirmed high‐grade cytology as the sole independent factor (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 13.81 [95% CI, 4.60–41.42], P
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?