A Fuzzy Group Decision Making Method with Positive and Negative Comparisons in the Ahp Method

Mingli Song,Zehao Gu,Witold Pedrycz,Wen Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4185667
2022-01-01
Abstract:In this article, we are concerned with developing a comprehensive fuzzy AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)-based Group Decision Making (GDM) framework. Traditional AHP- based GDM models assume all decision maker express their comparisons using nine integers (using the scale of integers {1, 2, 3, …, 9}) which ignores measuring the comprehensiveness of thinking of a certain decision maker since he/she only displays own positive comparisons. In contrast, negative comparisons together with positive ones compel decision makers to balance more factors thereby increasing the individual’s consistency. We construct a corresponding positive-negative comparisons based GDM framework that simultaneously incorporates fuzzy terms and weight distribution mechanisms. The key feature of this study is to develop a sound design framework by considering human beings’ variability and the ambiguity of linguistic terms in GDM and provide an initially different evaluation strategy and carry out its subsequent analysis framework. A fuzzy Geometric Consistency Index (GCI) test is designed to evaluate the consistency of fuzzy AHP problems. Meanwhile, Tucker's congruence coefficient (TCC) method is used to dynamically evaluate the importance level of each decision maker before aggregation. Some illustrative examples are provided to show the effectiveness of the proposed method.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?