Yan Liu,Claudia M. Eckert,Christopher Earl
Abstract:<p>Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a broadly applied multi-criteria decision-making method to determine the weights of criteria and priorities of alternatives in a structured manner based on pairwise comparison. As subjective judgments during comparison might be imprecise, fuzzy sets have been combined with AHP. This is referred to as fuzzy AHP or FAHP. An increasing amount of papers are published which describe different ways to derive the weights/priorities from a fuzzy comparison matrix, but seldomly set out the relative benefits of each approach so that the choice of the approach seems arbitrary. A review of various fuzzy AHP techniques is required to guide both academic and industrial experts to choose suitable techniques for a specific practical context. This paper reviews the literature published since 2008 where fuzzy AHP is applied to decision-making problems in industry, particularly the various selection problems. The techniques are categorised by the four aspects of developing a fuzzy AHP model: (i) representation of the relative importance for pairwise comparison, (ii) aggregation of fuzzy sets for group decisions and weights/priorities, (iii) defuzzification of a fuzzy set to a crisp value for final comparison, and (iv) consistency measurement of the judgements. These techniques are discussed in terms of their underlying principles, origins, strengths and weakness. Summary tables and specification charts are provided to guide the selection of suitable techniques. Tips for building a fuzzy AHP model are also included and six open questions are posed for future work.</p>
computer science, artificial intelligence,engineering, electrical & electronic,operations research & management science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to address the issue of how to handle the imprecision of subjective judgments in decision-making processes. Specifically, the paper reviews the application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP, FAHP) in industrial decision-making problems, particularly various selection problems. In practical applications, experts may not be able to provide precise numerical judgments during pairwise comparisons due to limited information or capability constraints, thus introducing fuzzy sets to represent these imprecise judgments. However, current research on FAHP rarely systematically compares the advantages and disadvantages of different techniques, leading to a somewhat arbitrary selection of appropriate techniques. This review paper aims to provide guidance to experts in academia and industry by categorizing and evaluating different FAHP techniques, helping them choose the appropriate FAHP technique in specific practical contexts.
### The main content of the paper includes:
1. **Introduction**: Introduces the application background of multi-criteria decision-making methods (such as AHP, TOPSIS, DEA, etc.) and emphasizes the advantages of AHP in handling complex multi-criteria decision-making problems. It also points out that the combination of fuzzy sets and AHP forming FAHP can better handle the imprecision of subjective judgments.
2. **Basic principles of FAHP**: Explains in detail the calculation process of FAHP, including constructing the hierarchy, establishing fuzzy pairwise comparison matrices, synthesizing judgments, calculating fuzzy weights, defuzzification, and consistency checking.
3. **Research methods**: Describes the methods of literature retrieval and analysis, selecting relevant literature published since 2008, and focuses on the application in fields such as supplier selection, machine selection, location selection, ERP system selection, project selection, and technology selection.
4. **Judgment representation**: Discusses the application of different types of fuzzy sets (such as triangular fuzzy numbers, trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, Type-2 fuzzy sets, intuitionistic fuzzy sets, etc.) in representing relative importance.
5. **Aggregation of fuzzy sets**: Explores how to aggregate the opinions of multiple experts in group decision-making and how to derive weights from fuzzy comparison matrices.
6. **Defuzzification**: Introduces methods to convert fuzzy values into crisp values for intuitive comparison.
7. **Consistency measurement**: Discusses methods to ensure the consistency of pairwise comparison matrices to reduce contradictions in judgments.
### The main contributions of the paper:
- **Systematic review**: Conducted a systematic review of FAHP-related literature since 2008, categorizing and evaluating different techniques.
- **Technical guidance**: Provided guidelines for selecting appropriate FAHP techniques, including summary tables and specification diagrams.
- **Future research directions**: Proposed six open questions to guide future research.
### Conclusion:
Through a systematic literature review and categorization, the paper provides guidance for experts in academia and industry in selecting appropriate FAHP techniques, helping to better handle the imprecision of subjective judgments in practical decision-making.