Comparison of common-path off-axis digital holography and transport of intensity equation in quantitative phase measurement

Ju Tang,Jiawei Zhang,Jiazhen Dou,Jiwei Zhang,Jianglei Di,Jianlin Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2022.107126
IF: 5.666
2022-01-01
Optics and Lasers in Engineering
Abstract:•Comparison of DH and TIE in quantitative phase measurement: DH and TIE are relatively mature measurement methods supported by extensive research, but both have their own limitations during implementation. Few papers focus on the comparison of the characteristics of TIE and DH yet, and most of they are based on theoretical analysis. Here we compare and analyze the two methods with sufficient experimental data.•Enough common factors of TIE and DH during implementation: We consider some common factors, including the grayscale of record image (or hologram), effective measurement area, temporal stability, noise and the focal plane offset, which are important but easily overlooked in measurement. Especially, for the grayscale of record image (or hologram) and the focal plane offset, there is no related research so far to discuss the effect of selection errors on the reconstruction results.•Enough experimental data: We measured some standard samples (microlens array and cake structure) and unknown samples (HT22 cells and fiber microstructure) to quantify and illustrate the effects of different factors. All data is obtained by a commercial microscope for TIE, and a homemade common-path off-axis digital holographic microscope for DH.•Useful for the measurements of two methods: We analyze the actual effect of each factor by quantifying and comparing the data, and summarize the conclusions in Table 1 in manuscript, which can be used as a reference for measurements using off-axis DH and TIE.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?