Development of a Novel Triaxial Rock Testing Method Based on Biaxial Test Apparatus and Its Application
Li Liping,Hu Jie,Li Shucai,Qin Chengshuai,Liu Hongliang,Chen Diyang,Wang Jing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02329-3
IF: 6.518
2021-01-01
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Abstract:As underground engineering projects and energy development projects continuously go deeper, rock disasters such as rock bursts, collapse, and water inrushes occur more frequently, bringing unprecedented challenges to the researchers in the field of disaster prevention and control (Wang et al. 2019a; b). The study on mechanical behaviors and engineering properties of rock under real stress state is of great significance for understanding the mechanism of rock fracture and deformation instability. The laboratory experiment is a significant approach and some novel test apparatus have been developed for specific rock failure modes in recent years. Representatively, Feng et al. (2016) modified the original Mogi-type triaxial testing apparatus to acquire a higher test accuracy and emulate three-dimensional stress paths in deep rock engineering. Zhang et al. (2018) developed a uniaxial tensile test apparatus and meet the requirement of obtaining tensile strength, tensile elastic modulus, maximum tensile strain, and complete stress–strain curves. Furthermore, Zeng et al. (2019) proposed a simple auxiliary apparatus to implement triaxial extension tests of cylindrical rock specimens, which can both realize the pure tensile stress state simulation. Regarding the different shear failure mechanisms, various apparatuses were successfully designed to conduct shear tests under different stress states, including compression-shear, tension-shear, and pure shear (Liu et al. 2017; Huang and Zhu 2019; Zhu and Huang 2019; Cen et al. 2020; Huang et al. 2020; Zhong et al. 2020). These new experimental technologies actively promote the study of rock mechanics. The triaxial testing apparatus, as an important tool to investigate the mechanical properties of rock under multiaxial stress state, is also widely utilized in the study of the three-dimensional failure criterion of rock (You 2009; Chang and Haimson 2012). Conventional triaxial testers are unable to achieve the unequal principal stress state of underground rock in three dimensions. In 1968, Moji developed the world’s first true-triaxial rock testing apparatus, and since then, various types of true-triaxial apparatuses had been developed by many researchers (Moji 1970; Haimson and Chang 2000; Chen and Feng 2006; Frash et al. 2014; Feng et al. 2016; Shi et al. 2017). Cube or cuboid rock specimens are used more often in true-triaxial tests than conventional ones. However, true-triaxial testing techniques need further development. Till now, the true-triaxial testing apparatuses have not been widely used as a standardized tool like the conventional ones (Li et al. 2012). It was not until 2019 that the International Society for Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering (ISRM) issued the recommended true-triaxial testing method to measure rock deformation, rock strength, and post-peak rock behavior under general stress state (Feng et al. 2019). It is still being improved. Moji (2007) proposed that the ideal triaxial testing apparatus should meet the following requirements: (1) the triaxial principal stress can be applied independently; (2) it can satisfy the conditions for high-stress application; (3) the stresses on the specimen surface are uniformly distributed with no stress concentration occurring. In view of the above three aspects, many researchers have made a lot of improvements in the triaxial testing apparatus. In the 1950s, the Yangtze River-500 triaxial rock testing apparatus was developed jointly by the * Jie Hu hjxz1996@163.com