Effectiveness of potential antiviral treatments in COVID-19 transmission control: a modelling study
Sheng-Nan Lin,Jia Rui,Qiu-Ping Chen,Bin Zhao,Shan-Shan Yu,Zhuo-Yang Li,Ze-Yu Zhao,Yao Wang,Yuan-Zhao Zhu,Jing-Wen Xu,Meng Yang,Xing-Chun Liu,Tian-Long Yang,Li Luo,Bin Deng,Jie-Feng Huang,Chan Liu,Pei-Hua Li,Wei-Kang Liu,Fang Xie,Yong Chen,Yan-Hua Su,Ben-Hua Zhao,Yi-Chen Chiang,Tian-Mu Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-021-00835-2
2021-01-01
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
Abstract:Background Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes an immense disease burden. Although public health countermeasures effectively controlled the epidemic in China, non-pharmaceutical interventions can neither be maintained indefinitely nor conveniently implemented globally. Vaccination is mainly used to prevent COVID-19, and most current antiviral treatment evaluations focus on clinical efficacy. Therefore, we conducted population-based simulations to assess antiviral treatment effectiveness among different age groups based on its clinical efficacy. Methods We collected COVID-19 data of Wuhan City from published literature and established a database (from 2 December 2019 to 16 March 2020). We developed an age-specific model to evaluate the effectiveness of antiviral treatment in patients with COVID-19. Efficacy was divided into three types: (1) viral activity reduction, reflected as transmission rate decrease [reduction was set as v (0–0.8) to simulate hypothetical antiviral treatments]; (2) reduction in the duration time from symptom onset to patient recovery/removal, reflected as a 1/ γ decrease (reduction was set as 1–3 days to simulate hypothetical or real-life antiviral treatments, and the time of asymptomatic was reduced by the same proportion); (3) fatality rate reduction in severely ill patients ( f c ) [reduction ( z ) was set as 0.3 to simulate real-life antiviral treatments]. The population was divided into four age groups (groups 1, 2, 3 and 4), which included those aged ≤ 14; 15–44; 45–64; and ≥ 65 years, respectively. Evaluation indices were based on outbreak duration, cumulative number of cases, total attack rate (TAR), peak date, number of peak cases, and case fatality rate ( f ). Results Comparing the simulation results of combination and single medication therapy s, all four age groups showed better results with combination medication. When 1/ γ = 2 and v = 0.4, age group 2 had the highest TAR reduction rate (98.48%, 56.01–0.85%). When 1/ γ = 2, z = 0.3, and v = 0.1, age group 1 had the highest reduction rate of f (83.08%, 0.71–0.12%). Conclusions Antiviral treatments are more effective in COVID-19 transmission control than in mortality reduction. Overall, antiviral treatments were more effective in younger age groups, while older age groups showed higher COVID-19 prevalence and mortality. Therefore, physicians should pay more attention to prevention of viral spread and patients deaths when providing antiviral treatments to patients of older age groups.