The Effects of Mask Wearing, Mobility Change and SARS-CoV-2 Interference on Seasonal Influenza in Northern China, Southern China, England, and the United States

Shasha Han,Ting Zhang,Yan Lyu,Shengjie Lai,Peixi Dai,Jiandong Zheng,Weizhong Yang,Xiao-Hua Zhou,Luzhao Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3943137
2021-01-01
Abstract:Background: Seasonal influenza activity typically peaks in winter months but plummets globally during the COVID-19 pandemic. Untangling lessons from the influenza's unprecedented low profile is critical for informing preparedness for incoming influenza seasons.Methods: We collect data from public sources in Northern China, Southern China, England and the United States. We estimate the individual effects of mask-wearing, mobility change (international and domestic) and SARS-CoV-2 interference, and forecast the influenza activity in the incoming 2021–2022 influenza season, using a country-specific inference model.Findings: The one-week increase of the mask-wearing intervention has a percent reduction of 11·3% to 35·2% on influenza activity in the four regions. The one-week mobility mitigation has smaller effects, 1·7% to 6·5% for the international and 1·6% to 2·8% for the domestic. In 2020–2021, the mask-wearing intervention alone could decline 13·3 to 19·8 percent positivity. The mobility change alone could reduce 5·2 to 14·0 percent positivity, of which 79·8% to 98·2% are attributed to the deflected international travel. Only in 2019–2020, SARS-CoV-2 interference has statical significant effects, and in Northern China and England only, reducing 7·6 (2·4 to 14·4) and 10·2 (7·2 to 13·6) percent positivity respectively. Compared to the epidemics in 2017–2019, longer and blunter rebounds could occur in the incoming 2021–2022 season should the mask-wearing be lifted, but the rebound would be smaller if the international mobility stayed low.Interpretation: Mask-wearing is more effective than mobility mitigation in all the four regions, although the relative advantage depends on the timing and duration of the interventions. Effects of SARS-CoV-2 interference vary at the timing of the influenza season and the speed of SARS-CoV-2 community transmission. The results improve our understandings of nonpharmaceutical interventions and other respiratory disease on influenza, and will inform the tailored public health measures for mitigating seasonal influenza and future pandemics.Funding: National Natural Science Foundation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, and the Bill & Melinda Gates FoundationDeclaration of Interest: The authors declare no competing interests.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?