Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate whether repeated alliances between two members of a patent pool boost enterprise innovation. Furthermore, this paper intends to determine whether the innovation performance becomes higher or lower based on the partnership characteristics. Design/methodology/approach In this empirical study, hierarchical regression is used to analyze the longitudinal data obtained from 12 patent pools managed by MPEG LA during a time period ranging from 2006 to 2018. The members of patent pools comprise research institutions, firms and universities. Research analyses are performed based on a sample of 68,400 member pairs who had established repeated alliances. The information regarding such pairs is gathered from public databases. Findings Repeated alliances positively correlate with enterprise innovation performance in patent pools; this performance is higher when the two enterprises have exploratory collaborations. Conversely, the performance is lower when the partners have a similar technology base and are engaged in a technological competition (competitive learning and patent litigation). Moreover, the performance is lower when one partner demonstrates higher network centrality and richer structural holes than the other partner. Originality/value Patent pools play an instrumental role in eliminating patent-licensing barriers, thereby allowing mutual acquisition of complementary technologies, and cooperatively strengthening technology development. From the perspective of theories of coopetition, knowledge management and social network, this study explores the impact of patent pools on enterprise innovation performance and ascertains the moderating roles of technology coopetition, technology similarity and network position, thereby expanding the scope of innovation effect in the context of patent pools.

Do Shared Auditors Facilitate Information Transfer Between Clients? Evidence from Patent Citations

The Spillover Effects of Innovation Content Disclosure in MD&A

Information Sharing Between Mutual Funds and Auditors

Tax Knowledge Diffusion Through Shared Audit Partners: Evidence From China

Privacy-Preserving Information Sharing within an Audit Firm

The Role of Shared Auditors in Goodwill Impairment and Long-term M&A Performance

The Effects of Audit Firms' Knowledge Sharing on Audit Quality and Efficiency

When your friend takes a fall: Spillovers of patent infringement lawsuits on firm innovation via cross-owners

Auditor Competencies, Organizational Learning, and Audit Quality: Spillover Effects of Auditing Cross-Listed Clients

Does Access to Patent Information Help Technological Acquisitions? Evidence from Patent Library Openings

How a Shared Auditor Affects Firm-Pair Comparability: Implications of Both Firm and Individual Audit Styles

Common Individual Auditors and Analyst Forecast Performance

On accounting’s twenty-first century challenge: evidence on the relation between intangible assets and audit fees

Shared auditors, information asymmetry degree, and mergers and acquisitions value creation

Audit Market Consolidation and Client Innovation

Can sharing auditors with customers improve suppliers digital transformation?

Does Product Similarity of Audit Clients Influence Audit Efficiency and Pricing Decisions?

Do Firms That Have a Common Signing Auditor Exhibit Higher Earnings Comparability?

The impact of revealing auditor partner quality: evidence from a long panel

Do repeated alliances within patent pools encourage enterprise innovation? Evidence from MPEG LA