Abstract:Purpose This study examines whether auditors’ pricing decisions on managerial ability are affected by auditor litigation risk (financial distress or financial crisis), auditor’s familiarity with their client or regulatory changes in the post-Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) era. Design/methodology/approach Building on the extant audit fee literature, this study constructs an audit fee determinants model to examine how context affects auditors’ pricing of managerial ability. Findings Auditors offer a larger fee discount to more able client management teams when auditors face lower litigation risks or are more familiar with the client. Furthermore, managerial ability has a more pronounced effect on audit fees in the post-SOX era when managers are mandated to play more active roles in financial reporting (i.e. certification of financial statements required by SOX 302). Research limitations/implications Based on the audit risk model (Simunic, 1980), Krishnan and Wang (2015) show that the managerial ability of an audit client is relevant and important to auditors’ pricing decisions. This study demonstrates that managerial ability exhibits a non-linear relationship with audit fees and contextual factors, such as litigation risk, and that auditors’ familiarity with managers can alter the negative association between audit fees and managerial ability. This study extends Krishnan and Wang’s study by offering additional insights into auditors’ use of soft information such as managerial ability. Furthermore, the findings add to the literature on the impact of SOX on audit fees by suggesting that SOX has not only increased overall audit fees (Ghosh and Pawlewicz, 2009; Huang et al., 2009), it has also increased auditors’ price sensitivity to soft information (e.g. managerial ability). Practical implications This study provides insights for audit firms and client companies who are interested in understanding audit fee-pricing decisions. The findings also suggest that auditors need to be sensitive and responsive to various contextual factors when making pricing decisions. Originality/value Previous studies have not addressed the non-linear relationship between audit fees and soft information about managerial ability.

Does Product Similarity of Audit Clients Influence Audit Efficiency and Pricing Decisions?

Product Similarity and Sell-Side Analysts

Does Audit Partner Workload Compression Affect Audit Quality?

Study on Initial Audit Pricing Discount of China's Public Companies:Evidence from Auditor Switch

The Effect of Engagement Auditors on Financial Statement Comparability

The Impact of Client Information Technology Capability on Audit Pricing

Does industry audit risk similarity affect auditor expertise? Evidence from China

Do Client Characteristics Really Drive the Big N Audit Quality Effect? New Evidence from Propensity Score Matching

Do auditors change their individual style? Examining the effects of client importance and competition on auditors' influence on earnings comparability in China

Do Individual Auditors Have Their Own Styles? Evidence from Clients' Financial Statement Comparability in China

Do Firms That Have a Common Signing Auditor Exhibit Higher Earnings Comparability?

Geographic Proximity between Auditor and Client: How Does It Impact Audit Quality?

Peer Firms in Audit Pricing: Evidence Under High Uncertainty Settings

Audit partner style and financial statement comparability: New evidence from the US market

Auditor Competencies, Organizational Learning, and Audit Quality: Spillover Effects of Auditing Cross-Listed Clients

The Effects of Clients' Controversial Activities on Audit Pricing

Does Hiring the Same Auditor within a Corporation Group Reduce Audit Fees?

CPA Firm Size and Audit Fee: Evidence from Chinese Local CPA Firms

The Contextual Nature of the Association Between Managerial Ability and Audit Fees

Managerial myopia and audit fees: Evidence from China

Auditor Distraction and Audit Quality