Abstract:Objective The widely use of ultrasound elastography has increased the detection rate of breast cancer.It has great advantage of differential diagnosis of breast tumor.Our study is to evaluate and compare the value of the quantitative ultrasound elastography parameters of AR ( area ratio) , ESR ( entire strain ratio) , LSR ( locolized strain ratio) , EFLR( entire fat to lesion ratio) and LFLR( locolized fat to lesion ratio) in the differential diagnosis of breast tumor. Methods 110 patients with 113 breast tumors were collected from Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region between January 2015 and January 2016 who underwent breast exami-nation.The tumors were divided into two groups according to patholo-gy which acts as gold standard:benign group with 59 lesions and ma-lignant group with 54 lesions.Participants underwent quantitative ul-trasound elastography parameters examination.AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR、LFLR were compared between benign group and malignant group and ROC curve was drawn.Conventional ultrasound and ultrasound elastography parameter are combined to differentiate the benign or malignant lesion.Calculate the various parameters on the accuracy、susceptibility、specificity、positive likelihood ratio、negative likeli-hood ratio of the diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions, and determine the quantitative parameter with the highest accuracy. Results The mean value of AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR of malignant lesions were all significantly greater than that of benign le-sions (P=0.000).Compared with the conventional ultrasound, AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR have higher AUC in the differentia-tion of benign and malignant breast lesions;AUC of AR and ESR are higher than conventional ultrasound、LSR、EFLR and LFLR( P<0.000).Compared with conventional ultrasound(1.523) alone, conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR、ESR、EFLR and LFLR have higher positive likelihood ratio(11.581、8.272、3.482、2.458、2.100) in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity(P<0.000).The AUC of conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR and ESR[0.940(0.890~0.990)、0.941(0.891~0.990)] were higher than conventional ultrasound and conventional ultrasound com-bined separately with LSR、EFLR、LFLR[0.669(0.669~0.768)、0.837(0.759~0.915)、0.763(0.673~0.852)、0.787(0.701~0.874)],so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity and positive likelihood ratio(P<0.000). Conclusion Quantitative ultrasound elastography may be helpful in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, especially combining conventional ultrasound with AR and ESR, which were superior to combining with the other parameters and provide a more objective and credible basis to differenti-ate benign and malignant breast tumors with conventional ultrasound.

Quantitative Indicators of Retraction Phenomenon on an Automated Breast Volume Scanner: Initial Study in the Diagnosis and Prognostic Prediction of Breast Tumors

The Value of Automated Breast Volume Scanning, Combined with Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesion

Comparison of Retraction Phenomenon and BI-RADS-US Descriptors in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses Using an Automated Breast Volume Scanner

Correlation between retraction phenomenon on the coronal planes and biological behaviors of breast cancer

Imaging Features of Automated Breast Volume Scanner: Correlation with Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of retraction phenomenon observed in 3 D ultrasonography of breast masses

RETRACTED: Diagnostic Significance of 3D Automated Breast Volume Scanner in a Combination with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Breast Cancer (Retracted Article)

Characterization of Breast Lesions: Comparison Between Three-dimensional Ultrasound and Automated Volume Breast Ultrasound

Intra- and peritumoral radiomics features based on multicenter automatic breast volume scanner for noninvasive and preoperative prediction of HER2 status in breast cancer: a model ensemble research

Virtual touch tissue quantification using acoustic radiation force impulse technology: initial clinical experience with solid breast masses.

Prediction value study of breast cancer tumor infiltrating lymphocyte levels based on ultrasound imaging radiomics

Machine Learning Based on Automated Breast Volume Scanner (ABVS) Radiomics for Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant BI‐RADS 4 Lesions

Diagnostic Value of Automated Breast Volume Scanner in Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions of Different Types of Ultrasound

Diagnostic performance of the automated breast volume scanner: a systematic review of inter-rater reliability/agreement and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions

Retracted: Diagnostic Significance of 3D Automated Breast Volume Scanner in a Combination with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Breast Cancer

Automated Breast Volume Scanner is More Valuable Than Hand-Held Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Small Breast Cancer

Magnetic resonance imaging semantic and quantitative features analyses: an additional diagnostic tool for breast phyllodes tumors

Correlation of Automated Breast Volume Scanner Imaging and the Difference of Molecular Subtypes Between Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Specimens

The differentiation of malignant and benign lesions of the breast by quantitative Ultrasound elastography

Quantitative analysis of breast tumours aided by three-dimensional photoacoustic/ultrasound functional imaging

Qualitative Evaluation of Virtual Touch Imaging Quantification: A Simple and Useful Method in the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions.