Why and How Manager Promotive and Preventive Psychological Ownership Influence Voice Endorsement

Jinyun Duan,Xiaotian Wang,Yue Xu,Lixiaoyun Shi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2021.153

IF: 5.6

2024-01-01

British Journal of Management

Abstract:By considering the literature on psychological ownership and regulatory focus theory, this study explored why and how two distinct forms of managers’ psychological ownership (i.e., promotive and pr...

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Linking Colleague Support To Employees' Promotive Voice: A Moderated Mediation Model

xiaoyun xie,chuding ling,shenjiang mo,kun luan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132123

IF: 3.7

2015-01-01

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Promotive voice is essential for improving team and organization performance. Yet in the current literature, less was known regarding the psychological reasons why people engage in promotive voice. Through the lens of social exchange, we proposed that employees who received support from colleagues may develop higher level of felt obligation for constructive change which leads to promotive voice. Analyses of multi-source data from 51 cross-functional sources (51 team supervisors and 162 employees) showed that employees' felt obligation for constructive change positively mediates the relationship between colleague support and promotive voice behavior. Moreover, the impact of colleague support on felt obligation for constructive change is stronger when there is a low level of subgroup formation in the team. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
Empowering Leadership Boosts Employee Innovative Job Performance: Unraveling the Role of Work Stress and Regulatory Focus

Chao Li,Zhongming Wang,Honghao Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/bjm-03-2024-0150

2024-01-01

Baltic Journal of Management

Abstract:PurposeThis paper aims to investigate the relationship between empowering leadership and innovative job performance, with challenge stress and hindrance stress acting as parallel mediators. Additionally, the study examines how promotion focus and prevention focus moderate these dual processes.Design/methodology/approachA two-wave survey was employed to validate the theoretical model, gathering data from 449 employees across various industries in Mainland China with a convenience sampling method.FindingsThe results demonstrate that empowering leadership enhances employee innovative job performance by increasing challenge stress and reducing hindrance stress, highlighting the moderating role of regulatory focus. Specifically, a high promotion focus strengthens the positive relationship between empowering leadership and challenge stress, while a high prevention focus weakens the negative relationship between empowering leadership and hindrance stress. The moderated mediation effect of regulatory focus is also verified.Practical implicationsEmpowering leaders should be mindful of employees’ dualistic work stress and implement tailored management strategies based on individual regulatory focus to maintain their psychological well-being and enhance innovative performance.Originality/valueGrounded in job demand-resource (JD-R) theory and a stress perspective, this study develops a dual-path model to explore the impact of empowering leadership on employee innovative job performance through dualistic work stress. This framework enhances our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of empowering leadership and the antecedent factors influencing employee well-being and innovative performance. Furthermore, by examining the role of employees’ regulatory focus, this study clarifies the boundary conditions of empowering leadership effectiveness, addressing inconsistencies in previous research findings.
Psychological Ownership: How Having Control Matters

Jun Liu,Hui Wang,Chun Hui,Cynthia Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01028.x

IF: 10.5

2012-01-01

Journal of Management Studies

Abstract:The study builds a cross-level work process control-based model of psychological ownership in a Chinese context. We operationalize individual-level control as participative decision-making and unit-level control as the self-managing team climate. We further theorize how the value orientation of employees to power differentials moderates the mediating effects of psychological ownership on the relationship between the two levels of control and employee outcomes. We found that the positive effects of control experiences on some outcomes are mediated by psychological ownership. Additionally, power distance moderates the mediating role of psychological ownership. Our results suggest that, in order to cultivate the positive effects of perceived control on employee contributions, managers should pay attention to employees high in power distance since these individuals are reluctant to exercise control. Training or encouraging these individuals to participate in decision making may help them cultivate the positive feelings of psychological ownership.
Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: A Two-Wave Examination

Jian Liang,Crystal I. C. Farh,Jiing-Lih Farh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0176

2012-01-01

Abstract:The present study demonstrates how three psychological antecedents (psychological safety, felt obligation for constructive change, and organization-based self-esteem) uniquely, differentially, and interactively predict supervisory reports of promotive and prohibitive "voice" behavior. Using a two-wave panel design, we collected data from a sample of 239 employees to examine the hypothesized relationships. Our results showed that felt obligation was most strongly related to subsequent promotive voice; psychological safety was most strongly related to subsequent prohibitive voice; and organization-based self-esteem was reciprocally related to promotive voice. Further, although felt obligation strengthened the positive effect of psychological safety on both forms of voice, organization-based self-esteem weakened this effect for promotive voice. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Feeling Possessive, Performing Well? Effects of Job-Based Psychological Ownership on Territoriality, Information Exchange, and Job Performance

Xingwen Chen,Cynthia Lee,Chun Hui,Weipeng Lin,Graham Brown,Jun Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001027

IF: 11.8025

2023-01-01

Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract:Job-based psychological ownership arises when workers develop personal feelings of possession over various aspects of a job. Drawing on conservation of resources and regulatory focus theory, the current research adopts a resource-based perspective to suggest a double-edged effect on job performance, mediated by three forms of territoriality (marking, defending, expanding) and information exchange and moderated by individual regulatory focus. With a multistep process in Study 1, the authors develop and validate a territorial expanding scale. Among 358 employee-supervisor dyads, Study 2 tests the proposed model; job-based psychological ownership prompts employees to engage in territorial marking, defending, and expanding. Territorial defending correlates negatively with information exchange, territorial expanding is positively related to it, and territorial marking has no relationship with information exchange. Information exchange is positively related to job performance. Job-based psychological ownership impedes job performance through increased territorial defending and reduced information exchange, especially among employees with a prevention focus. It enhances job performance through increased territorial expanding and increased information exchange, particularly if employees have a high promotion focus. These findings have notable implications for research and practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Job- and organization-based psychological ownership: relationship and outcomes

he peng,jon pierce

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-07-2012-0201

2015-01-01

Journal of Managerial Psychology

Abstract:Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between job- and organization-based psychological ownership. In addition, the authors explored the emergence and outcomes of psychological ownership in Chinese context. Design/methodology/approach - Time-lagged survey data from 158 Chinese participants were used to test several hypothesized relationships employing partial least square techniques. Findings - Job-based psychological ownership appeared to mediate the relationship between experienced job control and organization-based psychological ownership. In addition, a statistically significant relationship between job- based psychological ownership and job satisfaction, organizational citizenship behaviors and turnover intentions, and a statistically significant relationship between organization-based psychological ownership and job satisfaction were observed. A negative relationship between organization-based psychological ownership and knowledge withholding was also observed. Practical implications - Managers who want to enhance employees' job- and ultimately organization-based psychological ownership should empower their employees by enabling them to exert control over their work. Originality/value - This paper examined how organization-based psychological ownership emerges from control over work via job-based psychological ownership. The authors also investigated the impact of psychological ownership in Chinese context.
Employees' Psychological Ownership and Self-Efficacy As Mediators Between Performance Appraisal Purpose and Proactive Behavior

Min Qiu,Bei Hu,Xu Zhang,Yucai Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2015.43.7.1101

2015-01-01

Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal

Abstract:We analyzed the impact of performance appraisal purpose on employees' proactive behavior, and explored the roles of psychological ownership and self-efficacy as mediators in this relationship. We conducted a survey with 512 employees of enterprises in 4 cities in China. The results of analysis of the data collected showed that an evaluative performance appraisal had a negative influence on the employees' proactive behavior whereas a developmental performance appraisal had a positive influence. Psychological ownership and self-efficacy were found to have an intermediary role between performance appraisal purpose and the employees' proactive behavior. Self-efficacy had a significant positive effect on psychological ownership. Implications of these results for theory and management practice are discussed.
Impact of Leading by Example on Employees' Organizational and Job Psychological Ownership: A Moderated Mediation Study

ZhiXiao Ye,Xianfa Shang,Zahid Shafait,Youli Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.888653

2022-07-06

Abstract:This article studies the influence of leading by example on organizational psychological ownership and job psychological ownership. This article further introduces the mediating mechanism of organizational identification and the regulating mechanism of Leader-member Exchange (LMX). This study investigated 312 personnel from eight property management enterprises in East, Northwest, Northeast, and central China. This study adopts a quantitative research method, using survey data of project managers, team leaders, and managers of Property management projects in China. The data were collected by questionnaire survey. In terms of data analysis, AMOS 21.0 software was used to conduct structural equation modeling (SEM) using the maximum likelihood method to test direct and indirect effects. SPSS 25.0 software was used to test the moderating effect by multilevel regression analysis with the maximum variance method. Use these two methods to analyze the whole theoretical framework. The results established all assumed relationships. In this article, leading by example, one of the important dimensions of empowering leadership is studied as a new leadership style, and the predictive effect of leading by example on organizational psychological ownership and job psychological ownership is verified. This finding further verifies the influence mechanism and boundary conditions of empowering leadership in different dimensions. It is found that organizational identification has different mediating effects on leading by example and organizational psychological ownership and job psychological ownership. The moderating effect of LMX also further indicates that under the influence of Confucian pan-family culture, the leader's exemplary behavior with higher authority has a stronger influence on employees' organizational identification, organizational psychological ownership, and job psychological ownership. Their relationship is deeply influenced by the culture of China's unique organizational Circle Culture.
I Would Speak Up to Live Up to Your Trust: the Role of Psychological Safety and Regulatory Focus.

Yu Song,Peng,Guangtao Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02966

IF: 3.8

2020-01-01

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:Voicing upward refers to employee efforts to improve organizational functioning by making suggestions or expressing opinions and concerns. While extant studies have investigated how supervisors' behaviors or attitudes influence employee voice behaviors, researchers have paid little attention to the effects of employee perceptions on voice. Based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB), we developed and tested the effects of feeling trusted by supervisors on two dimensions of voice (promotive and prohibitive), focusing on the mediation role of psychological safety and the interaction effect of psychological safety and regulatory focus on voice. Using a sample of 244 participants and three waves of longitudinal data, we investigated whether feeling trusted would lead to both promotive and prohibitive voice through psychological safety. We also extensively examined the moderation effect of regulatory focus on psychological safety and the contingency dimension of voice. We found that promotion focus strengthens the positive relationship between psychological safety and voice (both promotive and prohibitive voice), whereas prevention focus strengthens the positive relationship between psychological safety and prohibitive voice. This paper concludes with a discussion of the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.
I Feel Like Owning It! Exploring the Antecedents of Psychological Ownership and Its Impact on Brand Loyalty in Digital Content Marketing

Quan Xie,Chen Lou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2023.2295258

2024-02-09

Journal of Interactive Advertising

Abstract:Content marketing is an effective approach to brand communication on social media and can inspire people to develop a sense of "ownership" toward the product/brand featured in branded content. Drawing on the theory of psychological ownership and the uses and gratification theory, this study proposed a comprehensive framework to explicate how individual motivations serve as precursors of psychological ownership toward products featured in content marketing, via two processing routes or intermediaries, namely consumers' flow experience and perceived content value. As such, this study identified six motivations explicating why consumers engage with content marketing: content inspiration , brand likeability , brand conversation , incentive , habitual pass time , and personal identity . Specifically, we found that some antecedents—the motivations of content inspiration, brand likability, brand conversation, and personal identity—positively predicted psychological ownership, via increasing flow and content value, respectively. Furthermore, psychological ownership was positively related to brand loyalty. These findings propose a comprehensive model explaining the process through which content marketing affects psychological ownership and subsequent brand loyalty.
Psychological Ownership: the Importance of Having a Say

Chun Hui,Cynthia Lee,Jun Liu,Hui Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e518392013-736

2010-01-01

Abstract:Session 262 - Posters: Groups/Teams & Motivation/Rewards/ Compensation & Strategic HR/Utility/Changing Role of HR: 262-27
Burden or opportunity? The role of employees' regulatory focus in shaping the motivational processes of empowering leadership

Liyuan Li,Ying Zhang,Xiaoming Zheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-11-2021-0410

2023-01-01

Baltic Journal of Management

Abstract:PurposeThe potential contradictory impact of empowering leadership may obfuscate its effectiveness. Empowering leadership is characterized not only by increased employees' autonomy but also by additional responsibilities and work demands, which may trigger different motivational processes for employees and lead to different perceptions of job stressors. This research aims to explore such contradictory impacts of empowering leadership on employees' perceived stressors by clarifying the complex motivational processes (intrinsic/extrinsic) experienced by employees when facing empowering leadership, as well as the boundary condition of employees' regulatory focus based on regulatory focus theory and self-determination theory (SDT).Design/methodology/approachThe authors examine the proposed theoretical model using a two-wave survey, with the data being collected from 294 employees working at a hotel in China.FindingsThe results show that both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation mediate the relationship between empowering leadership and employees' perceived stressors and demonstrate the moderating role of an employee's regulatory focus. Specifically, a high promotion focus strengthens the relationship between empowering leadership and intrinsic motivation, while a high prevention focus strengthens the relationship between empowering leadership and extrinsic motivation.Practical implicationsManagers should consider the attributes of front-line service employees (e.g. are they promotion-focused or prevention-focused?) when demonstrating empowering leadership to prevent employees from misinterpreting that leadership as a source of stress.Originality/valueThis research helps to reconcile previously conflicting findings on empowering leadership by clarifying the complex motivational processes behind it. Furthermore, this research adopts a regulatory focus perspective to suggest that the reason why employees respond to their leaders differently is inherently associated with each employee's motivational tendencies.
Linking Psychological Ownership to Innovative Behaviour in the Workplace: Empirical Evidence from Complex Management Systems in Pakistan

Minhas Mahsud,Hao Jinxing,Zafar Mahsud,Zhiqiang Chen,Mumuni Napari Hanifatu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4935834

IF: 2.3

2022-01-01

Complexity

Abstract:This research work investigates the association between psychological ownership and innovative behaviour with knowledge hiding and knowledge sharing as mediators. The latter variables are presented as focal antecedents of preventive and promotive psychological ownership. To conduct the study, a theoretical framework was proposed, and data was collected from professionals working in complex management systems in Pakistan. The analysis revealed that knowledge hiding and knowledge sharing can exist simultaneously, and psychological ownership can evoke both positive and negative feelings in employees, which poses a challenge for the management. The results illustrate that psychological ownership has significant associations with knowledge hiding, knowledge sharing, and innovative behaviour. Consequent theoretical contributions and important managerial implications are discussed at the end.
The Impacts of Distinct Motives on Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: The Differential Moderating Role of Perceived Voice Level

Qiwei Zhou,Jih-Yu Mao,Xin Liu,Xianhui Ning

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-021-09760-5

IF: 6.604

2021-07-22

Journal of Business and Psychology

Abstract:Drawing upon the citizenship motives framework and voice research, this study theorizes that both organizational concern (OC) and impression management (IM) motives are key predictors of employee promotive and prohibitive voice. This study further explores the moderating effect of perceived voice level in the work context on the relationships between motives and voice. The results of 140 pairings of supervisor-subordinate dyads indicate that both OC and IM motives are determinants of promotive and prohibitive voice. Moreover, perceived voice level in the work context plays distinct roles in moderating the main effects of motives on voice. Specifically, perceived voice level in the work context mitigates the influence of OC motives on promotive and prohibitive voice, whereas it strengthens the impact of IM motives on promotive and prohibitive voice. This study provides implications for both theory and practice. Limitations and future directions are also discussed.

psychology, applied,business
Does voice endorsement by supervisors enhance or constrain voicer's personal initiative? Countervailing effects via feeling pride and feeling envied

Mingyun Huai,Xueqi Wen,Zihan Liu,Xingyu Wang,Wen-Dong Li,Mo Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001191

2024-04-11

Abstract:While the previous research has examined antecedents of supervisors' voice endorsement, it has generally overlooked its effects on voicers' affective and behavioral reactions, probably because of the underlying assumption that supervisors' voice endorsement is inherently beneficial and likely to encourage more proactive behaviors in the future. In this research, we offer a theoretical model of the double-edged effects of supervisors' voice endorsement on voicers' subsequent personal initiative. Drawing on cognitive appraisal theory and related research, we proposed that supervisors' voice endorsement prompts two different cognitive appraisal processes in voicers that evoke two distinct emotional experiences-feeling pride and feeling envied-with countervailing effects on voicers' subsequent personal initiative. Specifically, voice endorsement results in voicers not only feeling pride, which enhances their subsequent personal initiative, but also in their feeling envied, which reduces their later personal initiative. Moreover, we extend the cognitive appraisal theory of emotion from a social constructionist approach by incorporating coworker support-an important relational context-as a contingent factor shaping the effects of voice endorsement on feeling pride and feeling envied and on voicers' subsequent personal initiative. The results from two field studies-a weekly experience sampling study with 574 observations from 119 employees and an event-based daily experience sampling study with 787 observations from 180 employees-largely support our theoretical model. This research suggests the importance of considering the perspectives of all the stakeholders in the proactivity triad (i.e., the focal employee, the supervisor, and coworkers) in order to sustain employee proactivity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
The Impact of Benevolent Leadership on Employee Voice: Dual Path of Self-prevention and Self-improvement

Yue XU,Jinyun DUAN,Chengyan LI

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2017.06.017

2017-01-01

Abstract:Based on Regulatory Focus Theory, we conducted a survey towards 407 staff and their immediate superiors, we explored the relationship between benevolent leadership and employee voice as well as the mediation effect of employee psychological safety and sense of personal status under the Chinese organization situation. What's more, the boundary influence of leader power was also investigated. The data analysis results showed that the benevolent leadership positively related to employee voice behavior and this relationship was based on employees' psychological safety and sense of personal status for a mediation role. Besides, the moderated mediation results showed that sense of leader power could weaken the positive effect of benevolent leadership that while employee felt more about leaders' power, the mediation effect of psychological safety or sense of personal status was weaker between benevolent leadership and their voice behavior. At last future directions and limitations are discussed as well.
It's mine! Psychological ownership of one's job explains positive and negative workplace outcomes of job engagement

Lin Wang,Kenneth S Law,Melody Jun Zhang,Yolanda Na Li,Yongyi Liang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000337

Abstract:Job engagement denotes the extent to which an employee invests the full self in performing the job. Extant research has investigated the positive outcomes of job engagement, paying little attention to its potential costs to the organizations. Integrating the extended self theory and the literature on psychological ownership as our overarching theoretical framework, we develop and test the double-edged effects of job engagement on workplace outcomes through the mediating role of job-based psychological ownership. Analyses of two survey studies with multisource multiphase data support that job engagement can lead to positive workplace outcomes including in-role performance and organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs) through job-based psychological ownership. At the same time, job engagement is also positively related to negative workplace outcomes including territorial behavior, knowledge hiding, and pro-job unethical behavior through the same mechanism of job-based psychological ownership. These indirect effects of job engagement on negative work outcomes are amplified by employees' avoidance motivation. The theoretical and practical implications are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Collective Psychological Ownership, Status Conferral Criteria And Team Creativity

Wei Lihua,Liu Zhiqiang,Liao Shudi,Long Lirong,Liao Jianqiao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00677

2019-01-01

Acta Psychologica Sinica

Abstract:Collective psychological ownership has been studies as the latest issue in the field of psychology. Existing studies have not yet explored the mechanism of how collective psychological ownership affects team creativity. This study aims to address the above gaps by examining whether, when and how Collective psychological ownership has impacted on team creativity. Based on the Motived Information Processing in Group Model, this paper first empirically explores the mechanism of collective psychological ownership on team creativity. This study theorizes that collective psychological ownership could affect information elaboration, and in turn enhanced team creativity. At the same time, criteria for status promotion would moderated the positive relationship that collective psychological ownership affects team creativity through information elaboration.In order to test our hypothesized model, we invited 101 Knowledge-based team leaders and their 800 subordinates who came from 16 big companies located in Wuhan, Zhengzhou and Guangzhou to participate in this research survey. In the end, we got 91 leader-followers dyads. As for scale to measure criteria for status promotion, we learned from Liu et al. (2013) measurement method of how to measure criteria for status promotion. Also, we adopte two items which are Adapted from the scale of Pierce et al (2004) to measure collective psychological ownership, as well as other measurements were well-established scales. Confirmatory factor analyses showed satisfactory model fit indices. Inter-rated agreement (Rwg) and intra-class correlation (ICC) value justified the aggregation of team information elaboration, Collective psychological ownership, Relationship conflict, Team Learning Behavior and Team Creativity.A hierarchical regression analysis method is adopted to test the hypothesized model. Results showed that collective psychology ownership has a positive impact on team creativity, and information elaboration mediates the relationship between collective psychological ownership and team creativity. Criteria for status promotion moderates the relationship between collective psychological ownership and information elaboration. However, criteria for status promotion does not significantly moderates the relationship between collective psychological ownership and team creativity through information elaboration.The present research makes some contributions to the Existing literature. First, by examining the positive effect of Collective psychological ownership on team creativity, this research proves the effectiveness of Collective psychological ownership beyond past literatures. Second, this study indicates the mediating role of information elaboration as well as its boundary conditions. For the practical implications, this research suggests that strengthening awareness of collective psychological ownership is conducive to the promotion of information elaboration and team creativity, also leaders should realize that criteria for status promotion will lead to different levels of competition, which impacts the relationship between collective psychological ownership and information elaboration.
How and when Does Abusive Supervision Influence Employees’ Promotive and Prohibitive Voice?

Jun Yang,Xiao-Hua (Frank) Wang,Darren C. Treadway,Yonghong Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04304-x

IF: 2.8

2024-01-01

Current Psychology

Abstract:In this study, we explore how and when abusive supervision may dampen two types of voice behavior: promotive and prohibitive voice. Drawing on social cognitive theory, we propose that employee voice self-efficacy (VSE) may mediate the negative relationships between abusive supervision and promotive/prohibitive voice. Furthermore, according to the conservation of resources theory, we argue that employees’ psychological resilience may buffer the negative indirect effects of abusive supervision on the two voice behaviors via follower VSE. Third, we propose that employees’ moral disengagement propensity (MDP) may attenuate the moderating effects of resilience, such that the buffering effects of resilience may occur only when MDP is low. We tested our conditional process model with time-lagged and multisource data collected from 656 employees and 99 supervisors in China. The results largely supported our hypotheses. Theoretical contributions and practical implications are discussed.
RESEARCH ON THE NON-BALANCED DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP AND ITS IMPACT ON ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR

姚凯,崔晓明

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-596x.2010.08.004

2010-01-01

Abstract:In this paper,psychological ownership is proposed based on the work itself of psychological ownership and a research on these two concepts is taken respectively for studying their impact on organizational behavior and the impact of their unbalanced development on organizational behavior.Through theoretical analysis and empirical testing,the result shows that both psychological ownership of organization and the work itself can explain organizational commitment,job satisfaction,OCB and ERB.But psychological ownership of work itself may explain more.Psychological ownership presents some differences on the organization and the working level and shows the development of non-equilibrium phenomena.Such non-balanced development of psychological ownership lowers organizational commitment and job satisfaction,and has a negative impact on OCB and ERB.Furthermore,this paper explains the generation mechanism of the dark side of psychological ownership and then proposes solutions to possible problems.

Why and How Manager Promotive and Preventive Psychological Ownership Influence Voice Endorsement

Linking Colleague Support To Employees' Promotive Voice: A Moderated Mediation Model

Empowering Leadership Boosts Employee Innovative Job Performance: Unraveling the Role of Work Stress and Regulatory Focus

Psychological Ownership: How Having Control Matters

Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: A Two-Wave Examination

Feeling Possessive, Performing Well? Effects of Job-Based Psychological Ownership on Territoriality, Information Exchange, and Job Performance

Job- and organization-based psychological ownership: relationship and outcomes

Employees' Psychological Ownership and Self-Efficacy As Mediators Between Performance Appraisal Purpose and Proactive Behavior

Impact of Leading by Example on Employees' Organizational and Job Psychological Ownership: A Moderated Mediation Study

I Would Speak Up to Live Up to Your Trust: the Role of Psychological Safety and Regulatory Focus.

I Feel Like Owning It! Exploring the Antecedents of Psychological Ownership and Its Impact on Brand Loyalty in Digital Content Marketing

Psychological Ownership: the Importance of Having a Say

Burden or opportunity? The role of employees' regulatory focus in shaping the motivational processes of empowering leadership

Linking Psychological Ownership to Innovative Behaviour in the Workplace: Empirical Evidence from Complex Management Systems in Pakistan

The Impacts of Distinct Motives on Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: The Differential Moderating Role of Perceived Voice Level

Does voice endorsement by supervisors enhance or constrain voicer's personal initiative? Countervailing effects via feeling pride and feeling envied

The Impact of Benevolent Leadership on Employee Voice: Dual Path of Self-prevention and Self-improvement

It's mine! Psychological ownership of one's job explains positive and negative workplace outcomes of job engagement

Collective Psychological Ownership, Status Conferral Criteria And Team Creativity

How and when Does Abusive Supervision Influence Employees’ Promotive and Prohibitive Voice?

RESEARCH ON THE NON-BALANCED DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP AND ITS IMPACT ON ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR