Abstract:Objective: A case-control study was conducted, to assess the complications, short-term effectiveness, and quality of life of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with conventional surgery in the treatment of rib fractures. Methods: From February 2018 to April 2021, 100 patients with rib fractures who required surgical treatment at the hospital were selected. Patients were randomly divided into control and study groups. The study group received thoracoscopy-assisted rib internal fixation, and the control group received traditional open reduction and internal fixation for rib fractures. The treatment effect, postoperative complication rate, surgery-related indicators, stress response, blood gas indicators, VAS (visual analog scale) pain score, and SF-36 quality of life score were compared between the two groups. Results: The total effective rate of the study group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The postoperative complications in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (χ 2-5.317; P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in hospitalization costs between the two groups (P > 0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, drainage tube placement time, postoperative activity time, and hospital stay in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The SF-36 score and VAS score in the study group were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Compared with the two groups after the operation, the levels of PaO2, SaO2, and PaO2/FiO2 in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Before surgery, there was no significant difference in stress response indicators such as cortisol, blood sugar, and C-reactive protein between the two groups (P > 0.05), but there was no significant difference in stress response indicators after surgery (P > 0.05). Cortisol, blood sugar, C-reactive protein, and other indicators were increased in both groups, but compared with the control group, the study group had decreased postoperative cortisol, blood sugar, C-reactive protein, and other stress response indicators (P < 0.05). Conclusion: There is a significant difference between thoracoscopic surgery and traditional surgery in the treatment of rib fractures. The probability of postoperative complications of thoracoscopic surgery is lower, and the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and incision length are better. The pain of patients before and after the operation is significantly reduced, the quality of life is improved greatly, and the stress response is weak.

Comparison between non-surgical and surgical management of rib fractures in major trauma patients without brain injuries

Comparative Study of Wound Outcomes and Surgical Strategies: Internal Fixation Versus External Stabilization in Rib Fracture Patients with Traumatic Chest Wounds.

Chinese consensus on surgical treatment of traumatic rib fractures (2021)

Comparison of patients who meet criteria for surgical stabilization of rib fractures versus those who actually get rib fixation: A single center review

A Cohort Study on the Comparison of Complications, Short-Term Efficacy, and Quality of Life between Thoracoscopic Surgery and Traditional Surgery in the Treatment of Rib Fractures

Comparison of minimally invasive surgery for non-flail chest rib fractures: a prospective cohort study

[Clinical Research of Percutaneous Monoplanar Screw Internal Fixation Via Injured Vertebrae for Thoracolumbar Fracture].

Thoracoscope-assisted internal fixation for treatment of rib fracture

Clinical efficacy of surgical versus conservative treatment for multiple rib fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Surgical Management of Multiple Rib Fractures in Polytrauma Patients: Semi-Damage Control Surgery

Retrospective cohort study of video-assisted thoracoscopic precise positioning reduction and internal fixation and thoracotomy reduction and internal fixation in treating multiple rib fractures

The application of electrical impedance tomography and surgical outcomes of thoracoscope-assisted surgical stabilization of rib fractures in severe chest trauma

Does the timing of surgery affect outcomes in young and middle-aged patients undergoing surgical stabilization of rib fractures? Feedback was based on real data from physicians, patients, and family caregivers

Intrathoracic plates versus extrathoracic plates: a comparison of postoperative pain in surgical stabilization of rib fracture technique

A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing nonoperative and operative management of chest trauma with multiple rib fractures

Analysis of the therapeutic effect and prognosis in 86 cases of rib fractures and atelectasis

Improved Outcomes after Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures in Patients with Polytrauma and Associated Chest Wall Fractures

[A Comparative Study on Operation and Non-Operation in Treating Fractures of Scapular Neck].

Treatment of traumatic rib fractures: an overview of current evidence and future perspectives

Prognostic factors for outcomes following surgical stabilization of rib fractures: A review of the literature

Management of non-union of rib fractures secondary to trauma: A scoping review