Abstract:Abstract Introduction: Older classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) patients are characterized by a significant reduced survival as compared to younger patients. In relapsed and refractory HL, prospective and retrospective studies showed that bendamustine monotherapy provided interesting efficacy with 30% of complete response with an acceptable toxicity profile. We developed the PVAB (Prednisone, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, Bendamustine) regimen in first line therapy to improve prognosis of older HL with advanced stage. Methods: In this prospective phase II, we recruited newly diagnosed classical HL patients age of 61 years or older with an advanced stage (Ann Arbor stage III, IV, IIB with risk factors). Inclusion criteria were: ECOG performance status 0-2; adequate cardio-pulmonary function with LVEF ≥ 50%; adequate renal function with creatinine clearance ≥ 40 mL/min; HIV negative; For patients aged 70 years old and more, a Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) ≥ 17. Treatment consisted of 6 cycles of prednisone (40mg/m 2 D1-5), vinblastine (6mg/m 2, D1), doxorubicin (40mg/m 2, D1) and bendamustine (120mg/m 2, D1) every 21 days. The primary endpoint was the complete metabolic response (CMR) rate according to local review after 6 cycles of study treatment or at premature treatment discontinuation according to Lugano Classification. We presented the final analysis of the study with a median follow-up of 42 months (range, 0.5-63.8), with prognostic analyses for progression free survival (PFS) measured from the date of inclusion to the date of progression, relapse or death from any cause. Prognostic factors included baseline clinical and biological characteristics, geriatric assessments and 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters especially baseline total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV). Optimal thresholds for some parameters were calculated using X-Tile approach. Results: Between July 2015 and July 2018, 89 patients were included in 34 LYSA centers. The median age was 68 years (range, 61-88) with 35 patients ≥70 years old (39%). The main histological subtype was nodular sclerosis cHL (n=56, 63%) with 26 EBV associated cases (LMP1 staining). Ann Arbor stages were as follows: II (n=3, 3%), III (n=30, 34%), IV (n=56, 63%). B symptoms were present in 57% of patients; 70 patients (80%) had IPS≥3. The median of CIRS-G score was 3 (range, 0-12). Seventy-eight patients (88%) completed the 6 cycles of PVAB. Update results for toxicity showed that 28 patients (32%) presented at least one serious adverse event (SAE) in particular infections (n=13, 15%), blood (n=11, 12%) and cardiac disorders (n=4, 4.5%). The CMR rate according to local review corresponding to the primary endpoint of the study was 77.5% (95%CI, 67-86) with 69 patients in CMR. After central review of 79 available PET/CT images, the CMR rate was 78.5%. Thirty-one patients relapsed or progressed (35%). The 4-year PFS rate was 50% (95%CI, 39-61). For the 69 patients achieving CMR, the 4-year disease free survival (DFS) rate was 62.8% (95%CI, 49-74). Twenty-four patients (27%) died: 11 cHL (46%), 4 treatment toxicity (17%), 6 second cancers (25%), 3 other causes after treatment (infection, cardiac insufficiency, pulmonary embolism, 12%). The 4-year overall survival rate was 69% (95%CI, 57-79). In univariate analysis, altered ECOG PS, Ann Arbor stage IV, bulky disease (>7cm), B-symptoms, extra-nodal involvement (>1), bone or medullar involvement, liver involvement, albumin (≤30g/l), hemoglobin level (<10.5g/dl), lymphocyte count (<0.8 G/L), leucocyte count (≥12G/L), CD4+ lymphocyte count (<0.41G/L), B2 microglobuline level (3 mg/l), CRP level (>88mg/l), TMTV (>450ml) and number of medications non-related to HL (>5) were associated with PFS. In multivariate analysis, liver involvement (HR: 3.79; 95%CI,1.71-8.43; P=0.001), lymphopenia (HR: 3.04; 95%CI,1.54-6.01; P=0.001), CRP (HR: 3.37; 95%CI, 1.69-6.69; P=0.0005) and co-medications (HR: 2.85; 95%CI,1.44-5.66; P=0.003) were independently associated with PFS. Conclusions: PVAB regimen provided high CMR (77.5%) with acceptable toxicity for advanced stage cHL patient over 60 years. The 4-year PFS and OS rates were 50% and 69% respectively, these survival endpoints were influenced by not related-lymphoma events. Prognostic analyses showed that specific involved site (liver), biological parameters (lymphocyte count and CRP) and patient's comorbidity (co-medications) influenced independently PFS. Disclosures Ghesquieres: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; Mundipharma Research Limited: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses. Casasnovas: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jaccard: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Laribi: Jansen: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Takeda: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; IQONE: Other: Personal Fees; Astellas Phama, Inc.: Other: Personal Fees; BeiGene: Other: Personal Fees; AstraZeneca: Other: Personal Fees; Le Mans Hospital: Research Funding. Morschhauser: BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Honoraria; Epizyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy; Genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZenenca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Brice: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Bendamustine is off-label drug use in Hodgkin lymphoma

Abstract:Abstract Background In contrast to the high cure rates in young patients (pts) treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy, classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) prognosis is poor in elderly pts, and very few data exist for pts considered too frail to receive standard-dose chemotherapy. In those patients, limited therapeutic options are available. Among the new immune-oncology drugs, Nivolumab, an anti-PD1 antibody, has demonstrated high response rate and very good tolerance, and is now approved in relapse and refractory (R/R) cHL. However, data on its use in the frontline setting are scarce. Material and methods We designed a prospective, open-label, multi-centric phase II study, to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab alone, or in combination with vinblastine in naive pts aged 61 years and older, with cHL and coexisting medical conditions. Pts were eligible if they had a Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric (CIRS-G) score of 6 or more. Treatment consisted in an induction phase of 6 nivolumab injections, delivered at a flat dose of 240 mg every 14 days. Early assessment was done at 12 weeks by PET-CT and CT-scan. Pts who achieved complete metabolic response (CMR) at early assessment completed treatment with nivolumab monotherapy for 18 additional cycles (consolidation phase). Pts who obtained partial metabolic response (PMR) or non metabolic response (NMR, stable disease) received a combination of 18 cycles of nivolumab plus vinblastine, administered intravenously. The primary objective of the study was to assess the CMR rate based on central review at the end of treatment (EOT). Results From August 30th, 2018 to April 28 th, 2020, 64 pts were included in 31 centers, which composed the full analysis set (FAS), used for safety evaluation. Among these 64 pts, 56 pts were fully evaluable and constituted the efficacy set (ES) used for the efficacy analysis (8 pts progressed early or were not assessed by PET-CT). The median age at inclusion in the ES was 75 years [range: 62-91]. Patients had a median CIRS-G score of 10 [range: 6-18] at baseline, and a median G8 score of 12.5 [range: 6-17]. Seventy-three percent of pts had a stage III-IV disease and 42.9% of pts had B symptoms. At EOT, 16 pts (28.6%) achieved CMR according to central PET-CT review. Ten pts (17.9%) achieved PMR, 10 pts were in NMR (17.9%) and progressive metabolic disease was observed in 17 pts (30.4%). Three pts were not evaluated. The overall response rate at end of induction was 51.9%, (9 CMR and 18 PMR). 23 pts received a consolidation with nivolumab and vinblastine. With a median follow-up of 20.1 months, median PFS was 9.8 months [95% CI: 4.2;12]. 15/64 pts of the FAS died during treatment (23.4%): 6 pts from lymphoma, 2 pts from toxicity of study treatment and 2 pts from concurrent illness. One patient died from toxicity of additional treatment after progression, and 4 pts from other causes. The 2-year overall survival was 76.7% [95% CI: 59.6;87.3]. 49/64 pts (76.6%) experienced at least one AE, among which 32 pts experienced grade 3-4 AEs. The 3 more frequent grade 3-4 AEs were neutropenia (8 pts), sepsis (7 pts) and respiratory tract infection (5 pts). Adverse events were related to nivolumab in 36 pts and led to treatment discontinuation in 19 pts (29.7%). Adverse events of special interest i.e., immune-related AEs, were recorded in 22 pts, including 3 pneumonitis, 1 myocarditis, 1 encephalitis and 1 colitis. Among the 64 pts of the FAS, 34% of pts completed the treatment. The median number of cycles administered was 7 [range: 1-24] for nivolumab and 17 [range: 1-18] for vinblastine. Conclusion The NIVINIHO study is the first study to assess the efficacy and safety of an immune checkpoint inhibitor for first line therapy in elderly, frail patients with cHL. The results suggest that in this setting, a nivolumab-based therapy is active in a subset of pts. Further studies and biological analysis are planned to determine which patients may benefit from this approach. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Lazarovici: Mundipharma: Other: Travel grant. Bouabdallah: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses. Morschhauser: Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZenenca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy; Genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; Epizyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Laribi: Takeda: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; BeiGene: Other: Personal Fees; Le Mans Hospital: Research Funding; IQONE: Other: Personal Fees; Astellas Phama, Inc.: Other: Personal Fees; AstraZeneca: Other: Personal Fees; Jansen: Research Funding. Feugier: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sibon: iQone: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Ribrag: Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PharmaMar: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nanostring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Argen-X: Research Funding; MSD Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Nivolumab. Presently labelled for relapse and refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma and other malignancies

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin and Low-Intensity Chemotherapy in Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed CD22+ Philadelphia Chromosome–Negative B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin as Induction Therapy for Patients Older Than 55 Years With Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative B-Precursor ALL

Inotuzumab ozogamicin combined with chemotherapy in pediatric B-cell precursor CD22+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of the phase IB ITCC-059 trial

Efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin in patients with Philadelphia chromosome–positive relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the INO-VATE Trial: CD22 Pharmacodynamics, Efficacy, and Safety by Baseline CD22

Post-Transplant Inotuzumab Ozogamicin for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Inotuzumab ozogamicin in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: efficacy, toxicity, and practical considerations

Association of leukemic molecular profile with efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin in adults with relapsed/refractory ALL

Inotuzumab Use: A Single-Center Experience in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Population Pharmacokinetics of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Pediatric Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of Study ITCC-059

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Zanubrutinib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL): Final Analysis of the Magnolia (BGB-3111-214) Trial

Inotuzumab ozogamicin for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: outcomes by disease burden

Molecular classification and prognosis in younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia and intermediate-risk cytogenetics treated or not by gemtuzumab ozogamycin: Final results of the GOELAMS/FILO acute myeloid leukemia 2006-intermediate-risk trial

Impact of Prior Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Treatment on Brexucabtagene Autoleucel outcomes in Adults with B-cell ALL

A multicenter study of posttransplant low-dose inotuzumab ozogamicin to prevent relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Pediatric-Like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Therapy in Adults With Lymphoblastic Lymphoma: The GRAALL-LYSA LL03 Study

Lenvatinib Plus Ifosfamide and Etoposide in Children and Young Adults With Relapsed Osteosarcoma: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Final Analysis of a Prospective Multicenter Phase II Trial of the Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA) Using Prednisone, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin and Bendamustine (PVAB) Regimen in First Line Therapy for Patients over 60 Years with Advanced-Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

Nivolumab First-Line Therapy for Elderly, Frail Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients: Niviniho, a Lysa Phase II Study

A phase 2 study of rituximab, bendamustine, bortezomib and dexamethasone for first-line treatment of older patients with mantle cell lymphoma

Inotuzumab in Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia—A Podcast