Abstract:Abstract Background: The curative potential of allogeneic transplant (alloHCT) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is hampered by relapse; the major cause of treatment failure. Risk factors for relapse include measurable residual disease (MRD) before or after alloHCT, transplantation in second complete remission (CR) or beyond, and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens. In ALL patients, relapse rates range from 30% to 50%, with most relapses occurring within the first year after alloHCT. After relapse, options for disease control are limited, and consequently overall survival is poor. Post-alloHCT maintenance may reduce MRD, provide time for graft-versus-leukemia to develop, and ultimately decrease relapse rates and prolong leukemia-free-survival. Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) is an anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody bound to calicheamicin which has significant activity against relapsed ALL. INO gained regulatory approval for the treatment of relapsed/refractory ALL based on a randomized phase 3 trial that showed an overall CR rate of 81% in the INO arm as compared to 29% in the standard arm. With the hypothesis that low-dose INO will be safe and will reduce the relapse rates, we are conducting a phase I/II study using this approach as post-alloHCT maintenance therapy. Methods: Eligibility included patients aged 16-75 who have undergone alloHCT for CD22+ALL in complete remission, have a high risk for relapse after alloHCT (MRD before or after alloHCT, transplantation, in second complete remission (CR) or beyond, reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen used, lymphoid blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia, or Ph-like ALL), have adequate graft and organ function, are between day 40 and 100 post-alloHCT, do not have active grade III/IV GVHD or any active GVHD of the liver, and have no history of VOD. The primary objective of this phase I clinical trial is to define a post-alloHCT maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of INO. Secondary objectives include describing the safety profile of INO post-alloHCT, determining the rate of veno-occlusive disease in this setting, evaluating non-relapse mortality (NRM), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at 1 year post-alloHCT and 1 year post-last dose INO, determining the incidence of myeloid toxicity and secondary graft failure, and determining if INO at these doses are effective at eradicating MRD in this cohort of patients. Pre-treatment tests include a bone marrow biopsy and aspirate to assess disease state and MRD. The trial design is a 3+3 model. The study treatment consists of a total of four 28-day cycles of INO starting at dose level 0 (0.3mg/m2) given on day 1. The first cycle must be initiated between day 40 and 100 after alloHCT. Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) include VOD, prolonged cytopenia (more than 28 days), and death. If there are no DLTs experienced in a cohort, patients are enrolled in the next highest dose level (Table 1). Patients are monitored with routine blood work during each cycle. At 1 year after alloHCT, patients are assessed by restaging bone marrow biopsy and aspirate. Patients are followed up to 12 months after the last dose of INO. Interim Analysis: As of July 27th, 2021, 17 patients have been treated with a median number of 3 cycles completed. Two patients went off treatment after 1 cycle of INO (patient choice, DLT(prolong thrombocytopenia)), two after 2 cycles due to cytopenia, and three went off treatment after 3 cycles of INO (patient choice (1), physician choice (2)). All continued to be followed for safety. We have completed 1-year post-alloHCT follow up on twelve patients. Eleven out of twelve patients were alive and in CR at 12 months from last dose of INO. One patient out of twelve died of recurrent disease at 12 months following last dose of INO. No patients experienced VOD. Significant side effects included thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. The percentage of any aGVHD is 59% and 0% grade III/IV aGVHD. The percentage of any cGVHD is 18%. Patient characteristics are described in Table 2. Conclusions: In the phase 1 portion of this study, INO at doses of 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 and 0.6mg/m2 was well tolerated. Thrombocytopenia may be the dose-limiting toxicity. The low observed rate of relapse, along with the safety profile, investigation of low-dose INO as maintenance therapy after alloHCT will be continued in a phase II trial. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Metheny: Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacosmos: Honoraria. Sobecks: CareDX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Caimi: Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; ADC Theraputics: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; XaTek: Patents & Royalties: Royalties from patents (wife); Amgen Therapeutics.: Consultancy. Majhail: Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Anthem, Inc: Consultancy. Boughan: Beigene: Speakers Bureau. Malek: BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Cumberland Inc.: Research Funding; Medpacto Inc.: Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Advisory board ; Takeda: Honoraria; Bluespark Inc.: Research Funding; Sanofi: Other: Advisory Board. Gerds: CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Constellation: Consultancy; PharmaEssentia Corporation: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Hamilton: Syndax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Equilium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Giralt: CELGENE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actinnum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JAZZ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JENSENN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PFIZER: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AMGEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SANOFI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. de Lima: BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Post- allogeneic transplant maintenance of inotuzumab for patients with ALL

A multicenter study of posttransplant low-dose inotuzumab ozogamicin to prevent relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Post-Transplant Inotuzumab Ozogamicin for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Safety and long‐term survival results of the addition of inotuzumab ozogamicin to the conditioning regimen of allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A single‐center phase 1,2 trial

Inotuzumab Use: A Single-Center Experience in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Inotuzumab ozogamicin for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: outcomes by disease burden

Efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin in patients with Philadelphia chromosome–positive relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Association of leukemic molecular profile with efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin in adults with relapsed/refractory ALL

Inotuzumab ozogamicin combined with chemotherapy in pediatric B-cell precursor CD22+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of the phase IB ITCC-059 trial

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the INO-VATE Trial: CD22 Pharmacodynamics, Efficacy, and Safety by Baseline CD22

Inotuzumab ozogamicin in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: efficacy, toxicity, and practical considerations

Inotuzumab ozogamicin for the treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: past progress, current research and future directions

Population Pharmacokinetics of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Pediatric Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of Study ITCC-059

Inotuzumab ozogamicin and donor lymphocyte infusion is a safe and promising combination in relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplant

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Indian Patients with B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Genomic determinants of response and resistance to inotuzumab ozogamicin in B-cell ALL

Post-Transplantation Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome in Adult Patients with B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated with Pretransplantation Inotuzumab

Chemoimmunotherapy with inotuzumab ozogamicin combined with mini-hyper-CVD, with or without blinatumomab, is highly effective in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first salvage

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin as Induction Therapy for Patients Older Than 55 Years With Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative B-Precursor ALL

Impact of Prior Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Treatment on Brexucabtagene Autoleucel outcomes in Adults with B-cell ALL

Cytogenetic guided therapy using blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin in a patient with relapse/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Preemptive interferon-α treatment could protect against relapse and improve long-term survival of ALL patients after allo-HSCT