The Importance of Early Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunction
K Tyler Hobbs,Madison Krischak,Rohit Tejwani,J Todd Purves,John S Wiener,Jonathan C Routh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S259307
2021-09-02
Research and Reports in Urology
Abstract:K Tyler Hobbs, 1 Madison Krischak, 2 Rohit Tejwani, 1 J Todd Purves, 1 John S Wiener, 1 Jonathan C Routh 1 1 Division of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; 2 Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA Correspondence: Jonathan C Routh Division of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC 3831, Durham, NC, 27710, USA Tel +1 (919) 684-6994 Fax +1 (919) 681-5507 Email Neurogenic bladder dysfunction is a major source of urologic morbidity in children, especially in those with spina bifida (SB). Complications from progression of bladder dysfunction can include urinary tract infections (UTIs), urinary incontinence, upper tract deterioration, and renal dysfunction or failure. In these children, there has been a recent trend toward proactive rather than expectant management of neurogenic bladder. However, there is a lack of consensus on how to best achieve the three main goals of neurogenic bladder management: 1) preserving kidney function, 2) achieving continence (if desired by the family/individual), and 3) achieving social and functional urologic independence (if appropriate). Hence, our objective was to perform a narrative literature review to evaluate the approaches to diagnosis and management of pediatric neurogenic bladder dysfunction, with special focus on children with SB. The approach strategies vary across a spectrum, with a proactive strategy on one end of the spectrum and an expectant strategy at the other end. The proactive management strategy is characterized by early and frequent labs, imaging, and urodynamic (UDS) evaluation, with early initiation of clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) and proceeding with pharmacotherapy, or surgery if indicated. The expectant management strategy prioritizes surveillance labs and imaging prior to proceeding with invasive assessments and interventions such as UDS or pharmacotherapy. Both treatment strategies are currently utilized and data have historically been inconclusive in demonstrating efficacy of one regimen over the other. We performed a narrative literature evaluating proactive and expectant treatment strategies as they relate to diagnostics and management of Spina Bifida. From the available literature and our practice, a proactive strategy favors greater benefit in preventative management and may decrease risk of renal dysfunction compared with expectant management. Keywords: bladder dysfunction, management, pediatric, neurogenic bladder, spina bifida, diagnosis Neurogenic bladder dysfunction is a major source of urologic morbidity in children, especially in those with spina bifida (SB). 1,2 SB is the most common permanently disabling birth defect in the United States, 3 affecting 3.5 of every 10,000 live births. 4–6 Individuals with SB and neurogenic bladder are at risk for chronic kidney disease, urinary tract infections (UTIs), and urinary incontinence. 6,7 The primary urologic goals of SB management is preservation of lifetime renal function, achieve urinary continence, and maximization of urologic independence as appropriate. 7–9 While significant improvements in care of neurogenic bladder and SB have been made in recent decades, the optimal urologic management of SB-related bladder dysfunction is not well defined. 10 Historically, patients were observed until symptoms or signs of neurogenic bladder or renal damage developed prior to intervention. 11 This is an expectant approach to management; some may refer to this as a selective or reactive treatment approach. Recently, there has been a trend toward a proactive, or early, approach – to intervene before any renal damage could start to develop. 6,12 This strategy was initially popularized by Bauer et al 13 and is perhaps best exemplified by the ongoing, CDC-funded, Urologic Management to Preserve Initial REnal function (UMPIRE) trial. 6 The proactive and expectant approaches are at opposite ends of the spectrum of management and some practitioners likely fall somewhere in between, practicing a more hybrid approach. In our practice, we have found that the proactive approach has a greater benefit in preventative management and may decrease risk of renal dysfunction compared with expectant management. However, there is still uncertainty regarding the best approach for managing pediatric neurogenic bladder and SB-related urologic care, there is a clear opportunity for further optimization, which would presumably lead to protection of renal function, improved urinary continence, reduced UTI rates, improved quality of life, 14 and decreased need for urologic surgery. 6 In addition, with inpatient and emergency department healthc -Abstract Truncated-