Complications of different methods of urological management in people with neurogenic bladder secondary to spinal cord injury

Tsai-Chin Cheng,Wen-Che Tseng,Chen-Liang Chou,Shin-Liang Pan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2023.2188393
2023-03-29
Abstract:To investigate the association between multiple types of urological management and urological complications in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). A retrospective cohort study. Single medical center. Medical records of SCI patients with regular follow-up of more than two years were reviewed. Urological management was classified into five groups: indwelling urethral catheter (IUC), clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), reflex voiding, suprapubic catheter (SPC), and self-voiding. We analyzed the incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI), epididymitis, hydronephrosis, and renal stone across the different urological-management groups. Of 207 individuals with SCI, the most common management type was self-voiding ( n = 65, 31%) followed by CIC ( n = 47, 23%). The IUC and SPC groups included more people with complete SCI than the other management groups. Compared with the IUC group, the SPC and self-voiding groups had lower risks of developing UTI (relative risk [RR] = 0.76, 95% CI, 0.59-0.97 and RR = 0.39, 95% CI, 0.28-0.55, respectively). The SPC group tended to have a lower risk of epididymitis than the IUC group (RR = 0.55, 95% CI, 0.18-1.63). Long-term IUC use was associated with a higher incidence of UTI in people with SCI. As compared to those with IUC, a lower risk of UTI was found in persons with SPC. These findings may have implications for shared clinical decision-making.
clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?