Abstract:Background: Allocation of health research funds among diseases has never been evaluated in China. This study aimed to examine the relationship between disease-specific funding levels of National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the main governmental resource for health research in China, and burden of disease.Methods: Funding magnitudes for 53 diseases or conditions were obtained from the website of NSFC. Measures of disease burden, mortality, years of life lost (YLLs) and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), were derived from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The relationship between NSFC funding and disease burden was analyzed with univariate linear regression. For each measure associated with funding, regression-derived estimates were used to calculate the expected funds for each disease. The actual and expected funds were then compared. We also evaluated the impacts of changes of disease burden metrics since 1990, and differences from the world averages on NSFC funding.Results: NSFC health research funding was associated with disease burden measured in mortality (R = 0.33, P = 0.02), YLLs (R = 0.39, P = 0.004), and DALYs (R = 0.40, P = 0.003). But none of the changes of mortality (R = 0.22, P = 0.12), YLLs (R = -0.04, P = 0.79) and DALYs (R = -0.003, P = 0.98) since 1990 was associated with the funding magnitudes. None of the differences of mortality (R = -0.11, P = 0.45), YLLs (R = -0.11, P = 0.43) and DALYs (R = -0.12, P = 0.38) from that of the concurrent world averages were associated with the funding magnitudes. Measured by DALY, stroke and COPD received the least funding compared to expected; while leukemia and diabetes received the most funding compared to expected.Conclusion: Although NSFC funding were roughly associated with disease burden as measured in mortality, YLLs and DALYs. Some major diseases such as stroke were underfunded; while others such as leukaemia were overfunded. Change of disease burden during the last 20 years and country-specialized disease burden were not reflected in current allocation of NSFC funds.

The output efficiency of the National Science Foundation′s rehabilitation funding from 2009 to 2018

Progress in neurorehabilitation research and the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China from 2010 to 2022

Comparative Study on Output Performance of Major Public Funds in Terms of Chinese-language Publications

An Empirical Study on the Output of Scientific Research Papers Supported by NSFC Project in a Teaching Hospital in East China

Neuroscience output of China: A MEDLINE-based bibliometric study

Research on the Long-Term Impact of Science Foundation on Academic Output

Analysis of SCI papers as projects output in oncology projects funded by NSFC from 2008 to 2012

Analysis of Projects Funded in the Field of Locomotor System from NSFC During 2010 to 2013

Public Funding and the Ascent of Chinese Science: Evidence from the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Analysis of major programs in the field of health science funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China between the years 2010 and 2018

Achievements in Cancer Research Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China

Funding allocation, inequality, and scientific research output: an empirical study based on the life science sector of Natural Science Foundation of China

Comparative study on structural transformation of R&D funds in PR China and USA

Analysis of projects funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China during the years of 2014–2018

Independent research of China in Science Citation Index Expanded during 1980–2011

Nsfc Health Research Funding And Burden Of Disease In China

Retrospective analysis of NSFC funding in osteoporotic field from 2006 to 2013

Analysis of population health projects funded by Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China between 2015 and 2019

Analysis of Contemporary Rehabilitation Research

Progress in osteoarthritis research by the National Natural Science Foundation of China