Abstract:PurposeThis study aims to investigate the tendency for firms, exhibiting an entrepreneurial spirit in their growth strategies, to engage in misconduct within the context of China's rapidly developing economy. The authors also examine how this relationship is influenced by governance mechanisms, specifically management shareholding and executive functional diversity. Furthermore, the authors explore the mediating roles of organizational complexity and performance pressure in linking entrepreneurial growth to firm misconduct. This research provides a novel perspective for understanding the impact of entrepreneurial growth on corporate ethical risks, and offers practical insights for maintaining ethical standards in firms during their pursuit of growth.Design/methodology/approachThis study focuses on publicly traded, mature companies that exhibit an entrepreneurial inclination in their growth strategies, demonstrating entrepreneurial vigor through activities such as product innovation and market expansion. This exploration incorporates both theoretical and empirical approaches, scrutinizing A-share listed companies in China from 2008 to 2019. To validate the robustness of this study's findings, the authors have applied diverse methodologies such as propensity score matching, classification regression, and alternative indicator analysis.FindingsThis study found that the entrepreneurial growth-oriented strategy is positively related to firm misconduct. It also uncovers that governance mechanisms like management shareholding and executive functional diversity moderate this relationship. Moreover, organizational complexity and performance pressure partially mediate the relationship between an entrepreneurial growth strategy and firm misconduct.Research limitations/implicationsFor instance, more detailed categorization of corporate misconduct, based on punishment severity, could be explored. Additional characteristics like age, education, gender, and team/board diversity could help further understand the relationship between entrepreneurial growth strategy and misconduct. By addressing these limitations and exploring further avenues for research, the authors can deepen the understanding of this relationship and provide valuable insights for firms seeking to mitigate potential risks.Practical implicationsFirst, for regulators, shareholders, creditors and investors, knowing and understanding the relationship between growth-oriented strategies and corporate violations is helpful for them to scientifically evaluate the potential risks that may exist in the company, and can also carry out differentiated supervision on the company based on different types of company-oriented strategies. Second, when designing the corporate governance mechanism, listed companies should fully consider the role of management shareholding. Finally, executives should treat cross-functional experience dialectically, especially in growth oriented strategic companies.Social implicationsThis research provides a novel perspective for understanding the impact of entrepreneurial growth on corporate ethical risks, and offers practical insights for maintaining ethical standards in firms during their pursuit of growth.Originality/valueThis study stands out by examining the influence of entrepreneurial growth strategy on firm misconduct, thus enhancing previous studies that primarily centered on entrepreneurial start-ups. The authors offer a nuanced comprehension of the potential risks intrinsic to corporate entrepreneurship and highlight the crucial role of efficient governance structures in curbing corporate misbehavior while fostering entrepreneurial growth.

Corporate Compliance Capability of EMNEs: a Prerequisite for Overcoming the Liability of Emergingness in Advanced Economies

Headquarters-Subsidiary Relationship and Foreign Subsidiary Innovation in Emerging Multinationals: A Loose Coupling Perspective

How does liability of origin influence cross-border acquisition completion? Evidence from Chinese firms

How Do Linking, Leveraging and Learning Capabilities Influence the Entry Mode Choice for Multinational Firms from Emerging Markets?

Overcoming the liability of outsidership for emerging market MNEs: A capability-building perspective

Exploring the Linkages Between Firm Misconduct and Entrepreneurial Growth in China

Do indigenous firms incur a liability of localness when operating in their home market? The case of China

MNE Microfoundations and Routines for Building a Legitimate and Sustainable Position in Emerging Markets

Ethics and the Liability of Foreignness: the Case of China

The Liability of Foreignness and Operational Security: Evidence from Emerging Markets

Can corporate social responsibility mitigate the liability of newness? Evidence from China

The path to overcoming the liability of foreignness using the eclectic paradigm: evidence from China

Do Foreign Firms in China Incur A Liability of Foreignness? the Local Chinese Firms' Perspective

Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises

Does Learning at Home and from Abroad Boost the Foreign Subsidiary Performance of Emerging Economy Multinational Enterprises?

Unpacking liability of foreignness: identifying culturally driven external and internal sources of liability for the foreign subsidiary

How do emerging multinationals achieve sustainable development globally? The enabling mechanism of headquarter‐subsidiary structure in subsidiary sustainability

Overcoming the Liability of Origin: Cross-Listing in Developed Economies As a Signal

An Integration of Premium and Liability of Foreignness

Autonomy Delegation to Foreign Subsidiaries: an Enabling Mechanism for Emerging-Market Multinationals

Dual liability and the moderating effect of corporate social responsibility–Evidence from Belt&Road investment of Chinese firms